Literature DB >> 11169564

Differences in complexity of isolated brachydactyly type C cannot be attributed to locus heterogeneity alone.

R J Galjaard1, L I van der Ham, N A Posch, P F Dijkstra, B A Oostra, S E Hovius, E J Timmenga, G J Sonneveld, A J Hoogeboom, P Heutink.   

Abstract

Hereditary isolated brachydactyly type C (OMIM 113100) mostly follows an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance with a marked variability in expression. This phenotype has been mapped to two different loci on chromosomes 12q24 and 20q11.2. The latter locus contains the cartilage-derived morphogenetic protein (CDMP)1 gene, in which a null mutation has been found in patients with malformations restricted to the upper limbs. A more complex brachydactyly type C phenotype has been mapped to chromosome 12q24. Differences in complexity of these phenotypes have been attributed to locus heterogeneity. Clinical subclassification based on the degree of complexity of the phenotype has therefore been suggested. We present patients with a complex brachydactyly type C phenotype in whom there is considerable intra- and interfamilial variability in expression. We show that clinical subclassification based on the complexity of the brachydactyly type C phenotype related to the genetic defect is not feasible. We present evidence that differences in complexity are not only due to locus heterogeneity, but that genetic modifiers and/or environmental factors must also play a role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11169564     DOI: 10.1002/1096-8628(20010122)98:3<256::aid-ajmg1088>3.0.co;2-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  8 in total

Review 1.  TGF-β Family Signaling in Connective Tissue and Skeletal Diseases.

Authors:  Elena Gallo MacFarlane; Julia Haupt; Harry C Dietz; Eileen M Shore
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Brachydactyly Type C patient with compound heterozygosity for p.Gly319Val and p.Ile358Thr variants in the GDF5 proregion: benign variants or mutations?

Authors:  Katja Stange; Claus-Eric Ott; Mareen Schmidt-von Kegler; Gabriele Gillesen-Kaesbach; Stefan Mundlos; Katarina Dathe; Petra Seemann
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  A mutation in the receptor binding site of GDF5 causes Mohr-Wriedt brachydactyly type A2.

Authors:  K W Kjaer; H Eiberg; L Hansen; C B van der Hagen; K Rosendahl; N Tommerup; S Mundlos
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Delayed fracture healing in growth differentiation factor 5-deficient mice: a pilot study.

Authors:  Cynthia M Coleman; Brooke H Scheremeta; Amanda T Boyce; Robert L Mauck; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Novel point mutations in GDF5 associated with two distinct limb malformations in Chinese: brachydactyly type C and proximal symphalangism.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Lihua Cao; Wenli Liu; Li Jiang; Miao Sun; Dai Zhang; Shusen Wang; Wilson H Y Lo; Yang Luo; Xue Zhang
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Frameshift Mutation in a Chinese Patient with Brachydactyly Type C Involving the Third Metacarpal: A Case Report.

Authors:  Qiuya Li; Fan Bai; Shanlin Chen
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Brachydactyly.

Authors:  Samia A Temtamy; Mona S Aglan
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.123

8.  Brachdactyly Instigated as a Result of Mutation in GDF5 and NOG Genes in Pakistani Population.

Authors:  Samiullah Khan; Muhammad Mudassir; Naqab Khan; Asmatullah Marwat
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.