Literature DB >> 11169316

Sources and impact of artifacts on clinical three-dimensional ultrasound imaging.

T R Nelson1, D H Pretorius, A Hull, M Riccabona, M S Sklansky, G James.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate, identify and discuss artifacts and their sources arising in three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) in clinical practice in order to increase the awareness of clinicians and sonographers with respect to common 3D US artifacts and to use this increased awareness to avoid or reduce the occurrence of misdiagnosis in 3D US studies. Patient 3D US data were acquired using several different scanners and reviewed interactively on the scanner and graphics workstations. Artifacts were catalogued according to artifact origin. Two-dimensional ultrasound (2D US) artifacts were classified whether they were of a B-mode or color/power Doppler origin and their presentation in the original scan planes and the resulting volume re-sliced planes and rendered images was identified. Artifacts unique to 3D US were observed, noted and catalogued on the basis of whether they arose during acquisition, rendering or volume editing operations. Acoustic artifacts identified included drop-out, shadowing, etc. whose presentation depended on the relationship between slice and imaging plane orientation. Color/power Doppler artifacts were related to gain, aliasing, and flash which could add apparent structure or confusion to the volume images. Rendered images also demonstrated artifacts due to shadowing and motion of adjacent structures, cardiac motion or pulsatility of the cardiac septum or vessel walls. Editing artifacts potentially removed important structures. Three-dimensional ultrasound is prone to the same types of artifacts encountered in 2D US imaging plus others unique to volume acquisition and visualization. The consequences of these diagnostically significant artifacts include mimicking of abnormal development, masses, or missing structures thus requiring careful study before reaching a diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11169316     DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00180.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  11 in total

1.  Sparsity driven ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Ahmet Tuysuzoglu; Jonathan M Kracht; Robin O Cleveland; Müjdat Çetin; W Clem Karl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Three-dimensional ultrasound of the fetus: how does it help?

Authors:  Luis F Gonçalves
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-01-29

Review 3.  Three-dimensional ultrasound of the neonatal brain: technical approach and spectrum of disease.

Authors:  Jessica Kurian; Susan Sotardi; Mark C Liszewski; William A Gomes; Thomas Hoffman; Benjamin H Taragin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-01-05

4.  Transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound imaging for detection of anatomic defects in the anal sphincter complex muscles.

Authors:  Milena M Weinstein; Dolores H Pretorius; Sung-Ai Jung; Charles W Nager; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 5.  Applications of Ultrasound in the Resection of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Rahul Sastry; Wenya Linda Bi; Steve Pieper; Sarah Frisken; Tina Kapur; William Wells; Alexandra J Golby
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 6.  Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of endometrial receptivity: a review.

Authors:  Juan Luis Alcázar
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Feasibility Study of Ex Ovo Chick Chorioallantoic Artery Model for Investigating Pulsatile Variation of Arterial Geometry.

Authors:  Kweon-Ho Nam; Juho Kim; Gicheol Ra; Chong Hyun Lee; Dong-Guk Paeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reproducibility of 3-Dimensional Ultrasound Measurements of Placental Volume at Gestational Ages 11 - 14 Weeks.

Authors:  M L Larsen; K V Naver; M M Kjaer; F S Jorgensen; L Nilas
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2015-12-28

9.  Output-Sensitive Filtering of Streaming Volume Data.

Authors:  Veronika Solteszova; Åsmund Birkeland; Sergej Stoppel; Ivan Viola; Stefan Bruckner
Journal:  Comput Graph Forum       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 10.  Editorial review: pediatric 3D ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael Riccabona
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2014-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.