OBJECTIVE: We have recently described a surgical technique for the treatment of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) that allows precise identification of vascular anastomoses (selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels, or S-LPCV). The purpose of this study was to compare S-LPCV with the previous non-selective technique (NS-LPCV) that targeted all vessels crossing the dividing membrane. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with TTTS were treated with NS-LPCV from May 1994 to June 1997 and with S-LPCV from July 1997 to December 1999. TTTS was defined as polyhydramnios of > or = 8 cm maximum vertical pocket (MVP) in the recipient twin and oligohydramnios of < or = 2 cm MVP in the donor twin. Outcome was measured as survival per number of pregnancies and per number of fetuses together with limited morbidity data. RESULTS: NS-LPCV was used in 18 patients and 74 were treated with S-LPCV. Three patients interrupted their pregnancies electively after surgery (S-LPCV) and were removed from further analysis. Survival of at least one fetus was higher in S-LPCV (83.1%) than in NS-LPCV (61.1%) (P = 0.04), mostly due to a lower rate of dual intra-uterine fetal demise in S-LPCV (5.6%) than in NS-LPCV (22%) (P = 0.05). There were more hydropic fetuses in the NS-LPCV group (27%) than in the S-LPCV group (5.4%), but this difference did not account for the results. There was no difference in the survival per number of fetuses between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: S-LPCV represents an important evolution in the surgical treatment of TTTS. The use of this technique by all centers should allow better comparison of fetal survival and morbidity rates. S-LPCV should be the standard technique in trials comparing amniocentesis versus laser for the treatment of severe TTTS.
OBJECTIVE: We have recently described a surgical technique for the treatment of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) that allows precise identification of vascular anastomoses (selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels, or S-LPCV). The purpose of this study was to compare S-LPCV with the previous non-selective technique (NS-LPCV) that targeted all vessels crossing the dividing membrane. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients with TTTS were treated with NS-LPCV from May 1994 to June 1997 and with S-LPCV from July 1997 to December 1999. TTTS was defined as polyhydramnios of > or = 8 cm maximum vertical pocket (MVP) in the recipient twin and oligohydramnios of < or = 2 cm MVP in the donor twin. Outcome was measured as survival per number of pregnancies and per number of fetuses together with limited morbidity data. RESULTS:NS-LPCV was used in 18 patients and 74 were treated with S-LPCV. Three patients interrupted their pregnancies electively after surgery (S-LPCV) and were removed from further analysis. Survival of at least one fetus was higher in S-LPCV (83.1%) than in NS-LPCV (61.1%) (P = 0.04), mostly due to a lower rate of dual intra-uterine fetal demise in S-LPCV (5.6%) than in NS-LPCV (22%) (P = 0.05). There were more hydropic fetuses in the NS-LPCV group (27%) than in the S-LPCV group (5.4%), but this difference did not account for the results. There was no difference in the survival per number of fetuses between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS:S-LPCV represents an important evolution in the surgical treatment of TTTS. The use of this technique by all centers should allow better comparison of fetal survival and morbidity rates. S-LPCV should be the standard technique in trials comparing amniocentesis versus laser for the treatment of severe TTTS.
Authors: Timothy M Crombleholme; David Shera; Hanmin Lee; Mark Johnson; Mary D'Alton; Flint Porter; Jacquelyn Chyu; Richard Silver; Alfred Abuhamad; George Saade; Laurence Shields; David Kauffman; Joanne Stone; Craig T Albanese; Ray Bahado-Singh; Robert H Ball; Larissa Bilaniuk; Beverly Coleman; Diana Farmer; Vickie Feldstein; Michael R Harrison; Holly Hedrick; Jeffrey Livingston; Robert P Lorenz; David A Miller; Mary E Norton; William J Polzin; Julian N Robinson; Jack Rychik; Per L Sandberg; Istvan Seri; Erin Simon; Lynn L Simpson; Larisa Yedigarova; R Douglas Wilson; Bruce Young Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Enrico Lopriore; Femke Slaghekke; Johanna M Middeldorp; Frans J Klumper; Jan M van Lith; Frans J Walther; Dick Oepkes Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2011-09-05 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Christie Bolch; Michael Fahey; Dinah Reddihough; Katrina Williams; Susan Reid; Angela Guzys; Stephen Cole; Andrew Edwards; Alison Fung; Ryan Hodges; Ricardo Palma-Dias; Mark Teoh; Susan Walker Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Adalina Sacco; Lennart Van der Veeken; Emma Bagshaw; Catherine Ferguson; Tim Van Mieghem; Anna L David; Jan Deprest Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 3.050