The development of a more equitable approach to resource allocation and manpower planning for undergraduate teaching in a UK medical school.

CONTEXT: Resource allocation and manpower planning in the clinical faculty of a UK medical school.
PURPOSE: To design a model, which is perceived to be fair, to determine indicative undergraduate teaching budgets to departments within the school from university resources and to specialty care groups of the main university hospital from service increment for teaching (SIFT) resources, and to aid manpower planning.
METHOD: The student load for each department is measured in full-time-equivalent student numbers (FTEs) for each specialty and compared with the total load for the whole curriculum to derive each department's percentage share of available undergraduate teaching resources. Data on staff numbers available for teaching, both from the school and NHS, are also included. Student load and teaching capacity are then compared. RESULT: Undergraduate teaching resources relate to student load in the resource allocation process, and changes to the course are automatically reflected. Staff data, when compared with student load, facilitate rational planning of establishment levels to meet the teaching needs of the undergraduate curriculum. Of the respondents to a survey of heads of departments and the faculty's management board, 88% agreed that it was a better approach to resource allocation than the previous historical basis. PRESENT LIMITATIONS AND SCOPE FOR DEVELOPMENT: Data are currently entered manually but will be transmitted electronically in the future via the Web. Further consideration will be given to the possible inclusion in the model of weighting factors for different types of teaching and to how appropriate measures of quality may be incorporated into the resource allocation process.
CONCLUSION: The model, despite some limitations, is a cost-effective and pragmatic management tool.