Literature DB >> 11168251

The immediate replacement of teeth by dental implants using homologous bone membranes to seal the sockets: clinical and radiographic findings.

B Rosenquist1, M Ahmed.   

Abstract

Placement of dental implants into fresh extraction sockets has several advantages compared to the original protocol. However, the soft-tissue handling is often complicated and the aesthetic results less rewarding. A method to use a homologous bone membrane as the sole sealer of the extraction socket after immediate implant placement is introduced and the outcome of 34 cases is presented. In 4 cases early losses of the membranes occurred (2 of these iatrogenic damage) in all other cases the homologous membranes were covered by proliferation of the surrounding mucosa within 2-4 weeks. In 2 of the 4 cases where the membranes were lost, the implants did not integrate, in the other 2 cases the implants did integrate but the sockets did not fill completely with bone and the aesthetic results were not acceptable. In all other cases bone filling of the socket occurred, the implants were stable at 180 days after insertion (functional success rate 94.1%) and the aesthetic results were excellent. The method thus seems very promising but the healing process is delicate and the operation site highly vulnerable during the first postoperative weeks. It should also be stressed that the present study offers conclusions neither about the quality of the newly formed bone nor about the quality of osseointegration offered by this bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11168251     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006572.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  6 in total

1.  The use of light/chemically hardened polymethylmethacrylate, polyhydroxylethylmethacrylate, and calcium hydroxide graft material in combination with polyanhydride around implants and extraction sockets in minipigs: Part II: histologic and micro-CT evaluations.

Authors:  Hatice Hasturk; Alpdogan Kantarci; Mazen Ghattas; Smit J Dangaria; Rima Abdallah; Elise F Morgan; Thomas G H Diekwisch; Arthur Ashman; Thomas Van Dyke
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 6.993

2.  The use of light/chemically hardened polymethylmethacrylate, polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate, and calcium hydroxide graft material in combination with polyanhydride around implants in minipigs: part I: immediate stability and function.

Authors:  Hatice Hasturk; Alpdogan Kantarci; Mazen Ghattas; Marcella Schmidt; Russell A Giordano; Arthur Ashman; Thomas G Diekwisch; Thomas Van Dyke
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Evaluation of initial stability and crestal bone loss in immediate implant placement: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Durga Prasad Tadi; Soujanya Pinisetti; Mahalakshmi Gujjalapudi; Sampath Kakaraparthi; Balaram Kolasani; Sri Harsha Babu Vadapalli
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2014-09

4.  Is The Periapical lesion a Risk For Periimplantitis? (A review).

Authors:  Z Rezaei Esfahrood; M Kadkhodazadeh; R Amid; Ar Rokn
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2012-06-30

5.  The influence of bone graft procedures on primary stability and bone change of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets.

Authors:  Sang Ho Jun; Chang-Joo Park; Suk-Hyun Hwang; Youn Ki Lee; Cong Zhou; Hyon-Seok Jang; Jae-Jun Ryu
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-04-25

6.  A clinical and radiographical comparison of buccolingual crestal bone changes after immediate and delayed implant placement.

Authors:  Viraj Amin; Santosh Kumar; Surabhi Joshi; Tanvi Hirani; Deepak Shishoo
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2019-10-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.