Literature DB >> 11168245

Diagnostic characteristics of clinical and microbiological tests for monitoring periodontal and peri-implant mucosal tissue conditions during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT).

S Luterbacher1, L Mayfield, U Brägger, N P Lang.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate a clinical and a microbiological test for monitoring tissue condition during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) and to compare their diagnostic characteristics at implant and tooth sites. Twelve female (age: 37-72 years) and 7 male patients (age: 26-83 years) were evaluated in this study on the basis of availability to follow a rigid SPT program. Patients had received a complete periodontal examination at 1 and 5 years after implant placement. This included standardized radiographs obtained at implants and matching control teeth. One implant site and one tooth site per patient were followed during the last 2 years of the SPT program. At each recall visit microbiological samples were analyzed according to DNA/RNA analysis identifying periodontal pathogens (IAI Pado Test 4.5, Institute for Applied Immunology, Zuchwil, Switzerland). Presence or absence of bleeding on probing at these sites was also noted using a standardized probing force of 0.25 N (Audio Probe, ESRO, Thalwil ZH, Switzerland). The percentage number of recall visits with positive bacteriological test results and positive BOP scores were calculated. Disease progression at the sites was defined if the annual increase in probing depth was > or = 0.5 mm/year (2.5 mm in 5 years) or if the annual decrease in CADIA values (Computer Assisted Densitometric Image Analysis) was more than -0.7 per year (-3.5 in 5 years). Changes below these values were considered as negative test results indicating stability of the sites. The diagnostic characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) of BOP and microbiological tests alone or in combination were then calculated using two-by-two tables. By application of increasing thresholds of BOP frequencies set for definition of positive test outcome (BOP > or = 10% > or = 20% > or = 25% > or = 50% > or = 75% > or = 90% or the combined BOP > or = 75%, but DNA positive > or = 10%, > or = 25% > or = 34% > or = 50% > or = 67% > or = 90%) receiver operator characteristics curves (ROC) were constructed for teeth and implants. The areas under the ROC curves were calculated and compared by means of chi-square tests. The results indicated statistically significant better diagnostic characteristics of both tests at implants compared to teeth. The inclusion of an additional microbiological test significantly enhanced the diagnostic characteristics of BOP alone at teeth as well as at implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11168245     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006521.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  14 in total

1.  Nonsurgical treatment of moderate and advanced periimplantitis lesions: a controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Katrin Bieling; Martin Bonsmann; Thilo Latz; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Peri-implantitis. Part 1: Scope of the problem.

Authors:  A Alani; M Kelleher; K Bishop
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Detection of periodontal markers in chronic periodontitis.

Authors:  Asa Leonhardt; Anette Carlén; Lisbeth Bengtsson; Gunnar Dahlén
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2011-07-07

4.  Clinical, microbiological, and immunological aspects of healthy versus peri-implantitis tissue in full arch reconstruction patients: a prospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Javier Ata-Ali; Antonio Juan Flichy-Fernández; Teresa Alegre-Domingo; Fadi Ata-Ali; Jose Palacio; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  Implant Maintenance: A Clinical Update.

Authors:  Minkle Gulati; Vivek Govila; Vishal Anand; Bhargavi Anand
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-07-09

6.  Bacteriological evaluation for one-and two-piece implant design supporting mandibular overdenture.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelwahed; Ahmed I Mahrous; Mohamed Farouk Abadallah; Hani Asfour; Hussien A Aldawash; Ebaa I Alagha
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

Review 7.  Diagnostic Principles of Peri-Implantitis: a Systematic Review and Guidelines for Peri-Implantitis Diagnosis Proposal.

Authors:  Ausra Ramanauskaite; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-09-09

8.  Comparative volumetric and clinical evaluation of peri-implant sulcular fluid and gingival crevicular fluid.

Authors:  Smiti Bhardwaj; Munivenkatappa Lakshmaiah Venkatesh Prabhuji
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.614

9.  Evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue and bone levels around early loaded implant in restoring single missing tooth: A clinico-radiographic study.

Authors:  Isha Bhardwaj; Anoop Bhushan; Chandrababu Sudha Baiju; Shweta Bali; Vaibhav Joshi
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

10.  Porous titanium granules in the treatment of peri-implant osseous defects-a 7-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Heidi Andersen; Anne Merete Aass; Johan Caspar Wohlfahrt
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.