Literature DB >> 11167844

Generation of human osteoclasts in stromal cell-free and stromal cell-rich cultures: differences in osteoclast CD11c/CD18 integrin expression.

C S Lader1, J Scopes, M A Horton, A M Flanagan.   

Abstract

Osteoclasts form in the presence of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of Nfkappab ligand (RANKL), a membrane-bound differentiation factor that is now available as a soluble recombinant molecule. Acquisition of the osteoclast phenotype [the alphavbeta3 subunit of the vitronectin receptor (VNR)-, calcitonin receptor (CTR)- and F-actin ring-positive cells] is associated with loss of monocyte/macrophage-associated integrins, specifically CD11b, CD11c and CD18. We hypothesized that differences in the osteoclast integrin adhesion molecule profile may exist in osteoclasts generated in stromal cell-rich and in stromal-free conditions. Unlike osteoclasts generated in vivo, F-actin ring-positive (resorbing) osteoclasts formed in soluble RANKL in vitro, in the absence of stromal cells, and co-expressed CD11c and CD18. However, when osteoclasts were generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) in co-cultures with the murine bone marrow stromal cell line 218 (which does not produce membrane-bound RANKL) in the presence of soluble RANKL, CD11c and CD18 were not expressed by osteoclasts. These findings indicate that the persistent expression of CD11c and CD18 is not accounted for by RANKL being presented in a soluble form and that membrane-bound RANKL is not required for the normal integrin expression in resorbing osteoclasts. This study demonstrates that potentially misleading information may arise by using data obtained from osteoclasts generated in the absence of stromal cells as they do not completely reflect the situation in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11167844     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02437.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  10 in total

1.  Morphological features of osteoclasts derived from a co-culture system.

Authors:  Vanessa Nicolin; Giovanna Baldini; Renato Bareggi; Marina Zweyer; Giorgio Zauli; Mauro Vaccarezza; Paola Narducci
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 2.611

2.  Skeletal tissues as nanomaterials.

Authors:  L Bozec; M A Horton
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Co-opting endogenous immunoglobulin for the regulation of inflammation and osteoclastogenesis in humans and mice.

Authors:  Lindsay M MacLellan; Jennifer Montgomery; Fujimi Sugiyama; Susan M Kitson; Katja Thümmler; Gregg J Silverman; Stephen A Beers; Robert J B Nibbs; Iain B McInnes; Carl S Goodyear
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-12

4.  A simplified method for the generation of human osteoclasts in vitro.

Authors:  James J Cody; Angel A Rivera; Jianzhong Liu; Julian M Liu; Joanne T Douglas; Xu Feng
Journal:  Int J Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2011-04-23

5.  Effect of Denosumab on the Change of Osteoclast Precursors Compared to Zoledronate Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Sung Hye Kong; Jung Hee Kim; Sang Wan Kim; Ae Jin Jeong; Song-Hee Lee; Sang-Kyu Ye; Chan Soo Shin
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2022-05-31

6.  Osteoclast-independent bone resorption by fibroblast-like cells.

Authors:  Thomas Pap; Anja Claus; Susumu Ohtsu; Klaus M Hummel; Peter Schwartz; Susanne Drynda; Géza Pap; Andreas Machner; Bernhard Stein; Michael George; Renate E Gay; Wolfram Neumann; Steffen Gay; Wilhelm K Aicher
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2003-03-26       Impact factor: 5.156

7.  Age of donor alters the effect of cyclic hydrostatic pressure on production by human macrophages and osteoblasts of sRANKL, OPG and RANK.

Authors:  C E Evans; S Mylchreest; J G Andrew
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Peripheral blood monocytes show increased osteoclast differentiation potential compared to bone marrow monocytes.

Authors:  Elina Kylmäoja; Miho Nakamura; Sanna Turunen; Christina Patlaka; Göran Andersson; Petri Lehenkari; Juha Tuukkanen
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-09-12

9.  The in vitro effect of pH on osteoclasts and bone resorption in the cat: implications for the pathogenesis of FORL.

Authors:  Mariusz Muzylak; Timothy R Arnett; Joanna S Price; Michael A Horton
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 10.  Recent Advances in Osteoclast Biological Behavior.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Jiangbi Li; Xiaoping Xie; Feng Gu; Zhenjiang Sui; Ke Zhang; Tiecheng Yu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-12-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.