Literature DB >> 11167047

Slow cortical potentials during retention of object, spatial, and verbal information.

V Bosch1, A Mecklinger, A D Friederici.   

Abstract

We used event related potentials (ERPs) to examine both the specificity and the timing of slow cortical scalp potentials (SPs) elicited by the retention of object, spatial, and verbal information in working memory (WM). Participants performed a modified delayed matching task in which a task cue presented in the middle of the delay interval indicated what type of information had to be retained for a subsequent comparison with the test stimulus. The first experiment used nameable objects and spatial locations as stimuli. The retrieval mode (visual vs. verbal) was manipulated by presenting either figural information or printed words as test stimuli. Transient ensembles of frontal and parieto-occipital slow waves with different scalp topographies for object and spatial information were evoked as a function of task cues. When words rather than objects were used as test stimuli highly similar, though more pronounced, fronto-parietal slow wave patterns were obtained. The second experiment using unfamiliar objects and non-nameable spatial locations indicated that neither the left frontal negative SP nor the posterior SPs are exclusively related to verbal working memory operations. The results indicate that a parietal negative SP reflects processes of spatial selective attention whereas a parieto-occipital positive SP indexes the retention of visual object information. Left frontal negative SPs are generated by a compound of higher order frontal control processes and vary as a function of information type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11167047     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(00)00040-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  17 in total

1.  The spatial mismatch effect is based on global configuration and not on perceptual records within the visual cache.

Authors:  Hubert D Zimmer; Günther Lehnert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-10-20

2.  Interactions between working memory and visual perception: an ERP/EEG study.

Authors:  Yigal Agam; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Modality and domain specific components in auditory and visual working memory tasks.

Authors:  Günther Lehnert; Hubert D Zimmer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-09-22

4.  The effect of conscious intention to act on the Bereitschaftspotential.

Authors:  Shiro Takashima; André M Cravo; Koichi Sameshima; Renato T Ramos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Auditory and visual spatial working memory.

Authors:  Günther Lehnert; Hubert D Zimmer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

6.  Characterizing the ERP Old-New effect in a short-term memory task.

Authors:  Jared F Danker; Grace M Hwang; Lynne Gauthier; Aaron Geller; Michael J Kahana; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Single trial prediction of self-paced reaching directions from EEG signals.

Authors:  Eileen Y L Lew; Ricardo Chavarriaga; Stefano Silvoni; José Del R Millán
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Visual short-term memory load modulates the early attention and perception of task-irrelevant emotional faces.

Authors:  Ping Yang; Min Wang; Zhenlan Jin; Ling Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Brain-mechanistic responses to varying difficulty levels of approximate solutions to arithmetic problems.

Authors:  Yanhui Xiang; Yiqi Jiang; Xiaomei Chao; Qihan Wu; Lei Mo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Sequential effects in continued visual search: using fixation-related potentials to compare distractor processing before and after target detection.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Verena Braunstein; Matthias Stangl; Alois Schlögl; Christa Neuper; Anja Ischebeck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.