Literature DB >> 11167046

Changes in cortical activation during mirror reading before and after training: an fMRI study of procedural learning.

J Kassubek1, K Schmidtke, H Kimmig, C H Lücking, M W Greenlee.   

Abstract

The neural correlates of procedural learning were studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the mirror reading paradigm. The aim of the study was to investigate a presumed learning-related change of activation in cortical areas that are involved in the performance of a nonmotor skill. Changes in cortical blood oxygenation contrast were recorded in 10 healthy subjects while they alternatively read visually presented single mirror script words and normal script words. Responses in naive subjects were compared to those acquired after training of mirror script reading. The acquisition volume included the motor and premotor cortex, the parietal lobe and the occipital lobe including its inferior aspects. Striate and extrastriate visual areas, associative parietal cortex and the premotor cortex were bilaterally active during normal and mirror script reading. Significantly stronger activation during mirror reading was seen in BA7 and 40 (parietal associative cortex) and in BA6 (corresponding to the frontal eye fields). Simultaneous eye movement recordings indicated that activation in BA6 was related to processing components other than saccade frequency. After training, BA6 and BA7 exhibited a decrease of activation during mirror reading that significantly exceeded nonspecific changes observed in the normal script control condition. The present findings confirm the hypothesis of practice-related decrease of activation in task-related cortical areas during nonmotor procedural learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11167046     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(00)00037-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  14 in total

1.  Cognitive procedural learning in patients with fronto-striatal lesions.

Authors:  Klaus Schmidtke; Hendrik Manner; Robert Kaufmann; Heike Schmolck
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Behavioral plasticity of antisaccade performance following daily practice.

Authors:  Kara A Dyckman; Jennifer E McDowell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Case mixing and the right parietal cortex: evidence from rTMS.

Authors:  W Braet; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  On how high performers keep cool brains in situations of cognitive overload.

Authors:  Susanne M Jaeggi; Martin Buschkuehl; Alex Etienne; Christoph Ozdoba; Walter J Perrig; Arto C Nirkko
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  The dynamic network subserving the three phases of cognitive procedural learning.

Authors:  Valérie Hubert; Hélène Beaunieux; Gaël Chételat; Hervé Platel; Brigitte Landeau; Jean-Marie Danion; Fausto Viader; Béatrice Desgranges
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Functional independence in resting-state connectivity facilitates higher-order cognition.

Authors:  G Andrew James; Tonisha E Kearney-Ramos; Jonathan A Young; Clinton D Kilts; Jennifer L Gess; Jennifer S Fausett
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Exploring the neural dynamics underpinning individual differences in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Chantel S Prat; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Contributions of procedure and stimulus learning to early, rapid perceptual improvements.

Authors:  Jeanette A Ortiz; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Neural signatures of phonetic learning in adulthood: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Patricia K Kuhl; Toshiaki Imada; Paul Iverson; John Pruitt; Erica B Stevens; Masaki Kawakatsu; Yoh'ichi Tohkura; Iku Nemoto
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  The rehabilitation of hemianopic dyslexia.

Authors:  Susanne Schuett
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 42.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.