Literature DB >> 11166447

Comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in pre- and postmenopausal women.

E F Dubois1, J P van den Bergh, A G Smals, C W van de Meerendonk, A H Zwinderman, D H Schweitzer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has been claimed as an alternative technique for risk assessment of hip fractures associated with osteoporosis. However, reports concerning modest correlations between QUS parameters and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in women raise questions about the reliability of QUS technology to predict bone mineral density (BMD). Partially, the lack of stronger correlations may be due to heterogeneity in bone architecture deterioration which may be more pronounced in older than in younger women. Therefore, it was thought important to study QUS/DXA interrelationships in subgroups of pre- and postmenopausal women.
METHODS: We studied 217 pre- and postmenopausal women between the ages of 25 and 75 years, who were referred for a BMD measurement because of osteoporosis in at least one family member either in the first or in the second degree. All women had a calcaneal QUS and a DXA measurement at the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck.
RESULTS: The linear regression coefficients between the QUS parameters broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) and DXA at the various sites in the group as a whole were 0.53 to 0.54 (P<0.0001). Significantly lower regression coefficients between BUA and DXA at the total hip and the femoral neck were found in premenopausal women (r=0.31 and 0.38, P<0.0001) compared to postmenopausal women (r=0.56 and 0.53, P<0.0001). For SOS there was no significant difference between the regression coefficients in the pre- and postmenopausal group. The overall prevalence of osteoporosis as assessed by DXA in the total group was 25% (6% in the pre- and 36% in the postmenopausal group). BUA failed to detect osteoporosis in all five premenopausal women but also in 20 out of 50 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis according to DXA measurements. SOS measurements were even worse in this respect.
CONCLUSIONS: Linear regression coefficients between calcaneal QUS parameters and DXA are only modest considering a group of 25--75-year-old Dutch women. In the subgroup of premenopausal women correlations between BUA and BMD at the hip and femoral neck are worse compared to those in postmenopausal women. The predictive value of QUS parameters for BMD is limited, therefore it is not appropriate to use QUS as a surrogate for DXA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11166447     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-2977(00)00102-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth J Med        ISSN: 0300-2977            Impact factor:   1.422


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of bone density in infancy and adolescence. Review of medical literature and personal experience.

Authors:  Luisella Pedrotti; Barbara Bertani; Gabriella Tuvo; Francesca Barone; Ilaria Crivellari; Stefano Lucanto; Mora Redento
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

2.  Phalangeal quantitative ultrasound technology and dual energy X-ray densitometry in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: influence of sex and menopausal status.

Authors:  V Camozzi; F Lumachi; F Mantero; M Piccolo; G Luisetto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry versus quantitative ultrasonography in diagnosing osteoporosis in patients with refractory epilepsy and chronic antiepileptic drug use.

Authors:  Kim Beerhorst; Joost Tan; In Yu Tan; Pauline Verschuure; Albert P Aldenkamp
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 4.  Is calcaneal quantitative ultrasound useful as a prescreen stratification tool for osteoporosis?

Authors:  K Thomsen; D B Jepsen; L Matzen; A P Hermann; T Masud; J Ryg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Relationship between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and hip dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in young healthy men.

Authors:  J Rawal; K Eleftheriou; J Skipworth; Z Puthucheary; M Loosemore; J Payne; F Dreno; M World; F Haddad; S Humphries; H Montgomery
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Quantitative ultrasound is better correlated with bone mineral density and biochemical bone markers in elderly women.

Authors:  Vasiliki Lappa; Ismene A Dontas; George Trovas; Evangelia Constantelou; Antonios Galanos; George P Lyritis
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Prescreening for Osteoporosis With Quantitative Ultrasound in Postmenopausal White Women.

Authors:  Bernhard Steiner; Hans Peter Dimai; Hubert Steiner; Sabrina Cirar; Astrid Fahrleitner-Pammer
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 8.  A review of menopause nomenclature.

Authors:  Ananthan Ambikairajah; Erin Walsh; Nicolas Cherbuin
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.