Literature DB >> 11165388

Lung cancer mortality rates in birth cohorts in the United States from 1960 to 1994.

D M Mannino1, E Ford, G A Giovino, M Thun.   

Abstract

We sought to describe the changing death rates from lung cancer in the US white population in sequential birth cohorts, adjusting for cohort smoking prevalence and duration. We searched the US mortality database (1960-1994) for all deaths among whites in which lung cancer was listed as the underlying cause of death. To determine the population at risk for lung cancer, we used the 1970, 1978-1980, and 1992 National Health Interview Surveys to estimate the annual number of current and recent smokers (those who had quit within 5 years) in 11 5-year birth cohorts, starting in 1901. We then determined annual lung cancer mortality rates for each birth cohort, stratified by sex and adjusting for the prevalence and duration of smoking. The population-based rates of lung cancer mortality were much higher among men than among women across all ages and birth cohorts, reflecting higher smoking rates among men. These differences decreased after we controlled for current and recent smoking within the cohorts and were slightly increased in women after we controlled for duration of smoking. Differences in lung cancer death rates across birth cohorts of US men and women primarily reflect differences in the prevalence and duration of smoking in these birth cohorts. Changes in cigarette design that have greatly reduced tar yields have a relatively small effect compared with that of people's smoking status and duration of smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11165388     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(00)00170-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  6 in total

1.  Has the lung cancer risk from smoking increased over the last fifty years?

Authors:  David M Burns; Christy M Anderson; Nigel Gray
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Clinical Laboratory Evaluation of Electronic Cigarettes/Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: Methodological Challenges.

Authors:  Melissa D Blank; Alison B Breland; Caroline O Cobb; Tory Spindle; Carolina Ramôa; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10

3.  Health impact of "reduced yield" cigarettes: a critical assessment of the epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  M J Thun; D M Burns
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  What is responsible for the carcinogenicity of PM2.5?

Authors:  R M Harrison; D J T Smith; A J Kibble
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Secular trends in mortality from common cancers in the United States by educational attainment, 1993-2001.

Authors:  Tracy Kinsey; Ahmedin Jemal; Jonathan Liff; Elizabeth Ward; Michael Thun
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The cumulative risk of lung cancer among current, ex- and never-smokers in European men.

Authors:  A Crispo; P Brennan; K-H Jöckel; A Schaffrath-Rosario; H-E Wichmann; F Nyberg; L Simonato; F Merletti; F Forastiere; P Boffetta; S Darby
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-10-04       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.