M Haas1, R Viney, E Kristensen, C Pain, K Foulds. 1. Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation Level 6, 88 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia. marionh@chere.usyd.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: the objective of this project was to use programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA), to inform the planning process of the South Western Sydney Area Health Service (SWSAHS) in respect of coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: a working party was established to carry out the project. The group set the parameters of the project and identified the programme, and associated the activity and resource use. Three sub-groups were established to undertake the marginal analysis. RESULTS: each sub-group (representing prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation for CHD) developed a list of potential strategies and provided estimates of resource use and consequences. These were prioritised and presented as recommendations to the SWSAHS. Some recommendations required enhancement funding for the SWSAHS. CONCLUSIOSN: while the use of PBMA presented some challenges, there were also some important outcomes. A comprehensive and detailed picture of resource use enabled the participants to form a view on how additional or reduced resources for CHD should be dealt with at the area level. The ultimate recommendations represent involvement by key stakeholders in the SWSAHS planning process, not just in identifying the 'vision' of CHD services, but also, how service delivery would be organised to achieve the overall objectives of reducing CHD morbidity and mortality.
OBJECTIVES: the objective of this project was to use programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA), to inform the planning process of the South Western Sydney Area Health Service (SWSAHS) in respect of coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: a working party was established to carry out the project. The group set the parameters of the project and identified the programme, and associated the activity and resource use. Three sub-groups were established to undertake the marginal analysis. RESULTS: each sub-group (representing prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation for CHD) developed a list of potential strategies and provided estimates of resource use and consequences. These were prioritised and presented as recommendations to the SWSAHS. Some recommendations required enhancement funding for the SWSAHS. CONCLUSIOSN: while the use of PBMA presented some challenges, there were also some important outcomes. A comprehensive and detailed picture of resource use enabled the participants to form a view on how additional or reduced resources for CHD should be dealt with at the area level. The ultimate recommendations represent involvement by key stakeholders in the SWSAHS planning process, not just in identifying the 'vision' of CHD services, but also, how service delivery would be organised to achieve the overall objectives of reducing CHD morbidity and mortality.