Literature DB >> 11164037

DNA G+C content of the third codon position and codon usage biases of human genes.

N Sueoka1, Y Kawanishi.   

Abstract

The human genome, as in other eukaryotes, has a wide heterogeneity in the DNA base composition. The evolutionary basis for this heterogeneity has been unknown. A previous study of the human genome (846 genes analyzed) has shown that, in the major range of the G+C content in the third codon position (0.25-0.75), biases from the Parity Rule 2 (PR2) among the synonymous codons of the four-codon amino acids are similar except in the highest G+C range (Sueoka, N., 1999. Translation-coupled violation of Parity Rule 2 in human genes is not the cause of heterogeneity of the DNA G+C content of third codon position. Gene 238, 53-58.). PR2 is an intra-strand rule where A=T and G=C are expected when there are no biases between the two complementary strands of DNA in mutation and selection rates (substitution rates). In this study, 14,026 human genes were analyzed. In addition, the third codon positions of two-codon amino acids were analyzed. New results show the following: (a) The G+C contents of the third codon position of human genes are scattered in the G+C range of 0.22-0.96 in the third codon position. (b) The PR2 biases are similar in the range of 0.25-0.75, whereas, in the high G+C range (0.75-0.96; 13% of the genes), the PR2-bias fingerprints are different from those of the major range. (c) Unlike the PR2 biases, the G+C contents of the third codon position for both four-codon and two-codon amino acids are all correlated almost perfectly with the G+C content of the third codon position over the total G+C ranges. These results support the notion that the directional mutation pressure, rather than the directional selection pressure, is mainly responsible for the heterogeneity of the G+C content of the third codon position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11164037     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00480-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  44 in total

1.  DNA helix: the importance of being GC-rich.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Relationships among stop codon usage bias, its context, isochores, and gene expression level in various eukaryotes.

Authors:  Jingchun Sun; Ming Chen; Jinlin Xu; Jianhua Luo
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Nonneutral GC3 and retroelement codon mimicry in Phytophthora.

Authors:  Rays H Y Jiang; Francine Govers
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  On the correlation between the synonymy of codon usage and taxonomy.

Authors:  M G Sadovsky; Y A Putintseva
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.788

5.  Analysis of synonymous codon usage patterns in different plant mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Meng Zhou; Xia Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Compositional bias coupled with selection and mutation pressure drives codon usage in Brassica campestris genes.

Authors:  Prosenjit Paul; Arup Kumar Malakar; Supriyo Chakraborty
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.391

7.  Comparative analysis of expressed sequences reveals a conserved pattern of optimal codon usage in plants.

Authors:  Liangjiang Wang; Marilyn J Roossinck
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Synonymous codon usage bias dependent on local nucleotide context in the class Deinococci.

Authors:  Robert W Cutler; Panuwan Chantawannakul
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Isochores and tissue-specificity.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The coexistence of the nucleosome positioning code with the genetic code on eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amir B Cohanim; Tali E Haran
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.