Literature DB >> 11162329

Preventive and other interactional skills of general practitioners, surgeons, and physicians: perceived competence and endorsement of postgraduate training.

A Girgis1, R W Sanson-Fisher, R A Walsh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perceived competencies and support for formal postgraduate training across a range of preventive and other interactional skills were examined in three medical groups.
METHODS: All eligible final year students and recent graduates of the three major Australian medical colleges (n = 767) were mailed a questionnaire examining communication skills in four domains: preventive, educational, therapeutic, and general.
RESULTS: Overall consent rate was 45%. For most items, at least one-third of each group reported low competence. On preventive items, low competence ratings ranged from 5 to 39% in general practice, 38 to 67% in surgery, and 33 to 51% in the speciality physician group. Significant intergroup differences occurred on eight competence items. Agreement with training on preventive topics ranged from 80 to 91% in general practice, 48 to 69% in surgery, and 72 to 82% in the specialty physician group. On all 11 training items where significant differences occurred, the general practice group reported the highest level and the surgeon group the lowest level of endorsement for formal training and assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: Substantial proportions in the general practice, surgery, and the physician specialty report lack of competence in common interactional skills. There were high levels of support for formal training in preventive and other interactional skills. The strong endorsement supports the development of effective, tailored interactional skills training programs. Copyright 2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11162329     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  1 in total

1.  Can teaching agenda-setting skills to physicians improve clinical interaction quality? A controlled intervention.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Michael P Anastario; Richard M Frankel; Esosa G Odigie; William H Rogers; Ted von Glahn; Dana G Safran
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 2.463

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.