Literature DB >> 11162278

Regional brain activity during different paradigms of mental rotation in healthy volunteers: a positron emission tomography study.

G Vingerhoets1, P Santens, K Van Laere, P Lahorte, R A Dierckx, J De Reuck.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to observe changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in 10 right-handed healthy volunteers performing two paradigms of mental rotation. In one paradigm, subjects mentally rotated a single alphanumeric stimulus to determine whether it was shown in a normal or mirror-image position. In a second paradigm, subjects mentally rotated and compared pairs of figurative stimuli to determine whether the stimuli were identical or mirror-images. In both paradigms, rCBF was compared with a control task that used identical stimuli, but required no mental rotation. Mental rotation of single alphanumeric stimuli engendered activation in the primary somatomotor area in the left precentral gyrus. Mental rotation of paired figures engendered activation in the left superior parietal lobule and the right frontal medial gyrus. A deactivated area was located in the medial part of the left superior frontal gyrus. Comparison of both paradigms revealed that the left gyrus precentralis was activated significantly during the alphanumeric condition and that the left gyrus lingualis was significantly activated during the paired figures condition. Motor processes may be an inherent part of every mental rotation but the type of motor involvement appears strongly dependent on the specific task or the specific stimuli. Similar paradigms, designed to isolate the same cognitive function, in the same subjects, using the same imaging technology and methodology, but differing only in stimulus material, lead to different areas of neural activation. Task specificity determines the most significant changes in cerebral blood flow in different mental rotation paradigms. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11162278     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  13 in total

1.  Vision for action in toddlers: the posting task.

Authors:  Sandra Y Street; Karin H James; Susan S Jones; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2011-10-17

2.  Brain activation during mental rotation in school children and adults.

Authors:  K Kucian; M von Aster; T Loenneker; T Dietrich; F W Mast; E Martin
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Influence of galvanic vestibular stimulation on egocentric and object-based mental transformations.

Authors:  Bigna Lenggenhager; Christophe Lopez; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Understanding spatial transformations: similarities and differences between mental rotation and mental folding.

Authors:  Justin Harris; Kathy Hirsh-Pasek; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-02-09

5.  At the mercy of strategies: the role of motor representations in language understanding.

Authors:  Barbara Tomasino; Raffaella Ida Rumiati
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-04

Review 6.  Spatial cognition, body representation and affective processes: the role of vestibular information beyond ocular reflexes and control of posture.

Authors:  Fred W Mast; Nora Preuss; Matthias Hartmann; Luzia Grabherr
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-27

7.  Different strategies do not moderate primary motor cortex involvement in mental rotation: a TMS study.

Authors:  Stefan Bode; Susan Koeneke; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 3.759

8.  Mental rotation of faces in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Cassandra A Adduri; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Cognitive Side of M1.

Authors:  Barbara Tomasino; Michele Gremese
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Effects of Stimulus Type and Strategy on Mental Rotation Network: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Tomasino; Michele Gremese
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.