Literature DB >> 11162270

Representation of the ear in human primary somatosensory cortex.

T Nihashi1, R Kakigi, O Kawakami, M Hoshiyama, K Itomi, H Nakanishi, Y Kajita, S Inao, J Yoshida.   

Abstract

We studied 13 healthy subjects with a multichannel magnetoencephalography (MEG) system to investigate the somatotopic representation of the ear in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI). We stimulated three parts of the left ear: the helix, the lobulus, and the tragus. The somatosensory-evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) were successfully measured in 7 of 13 subjects. Short-latency responses were analyzed using both single dipole and multidipole models (brain electric source analysis, BESA). From the single dipole model, the equivalent current dipole (ECD) following the helix stimulation was estimated to be near the neck area of SI in all the subjects. In the lobulus stimulation, the ECDs were estimated around the neck area of SI in four subjects, in the face area in one subject, and in the deep white matter in two subjects. In the tragus stimulation, the ECDs were estimated around the neck area of SI in three subjects, in the hand area of SI in two subjects, and in the deep white matter in two subjects. When the ECDs were estimated to be located in unlikely sites (hand area and deep white matter), a two-dipole model, (1) the neck area of SI and (2) face area of SI, was found to be the most appropriate. Although this might be a preliminary study due to a relatively small number of subjects, it revealed that receptive fields of some part of the ear, such as the lobulus and tragus, might be present in both the neck and face areas of SI. These findings suggested that the "ear area" of SI has variability between subjects, unlike the other areas of SI, possibly because the ear is located on the border between the neck and face. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11162270     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  6 in total

1.  How the vestibular system modulates tactile perception in normal subjects: a behavioural and physiological study.

Authors:  Elisa Raffaella Ferrè; Anna Sedda; Martina Gandola; Gabriella Bottini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neurophysiologic effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) via electrical stimulation of the tragus: A concurrent taVNS/fMRI study and review.

Authors:  Bashar W Badran; Logan T Dowdle; Oliver J Mithoefer; Nicholas T LaBate; James Coatsworth; Joshua C Brown; William H DeVries; Christopher W Austelle; Lisa M McTeague; Mark S George
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Rapid Alleviation of Parkinson's Disease Symptoms via Electrostimulation of Intrinsic Auricular Muscle Zones.

Authors:  Yusuf O Cakmak; Hülya Apaydin; Güneş Kiziltan; Ayşegül Gündüz; Burak Ozsoy; Selim Olcer; Hakan Urey; Ozgur O Cakmak; Yasemin G Ozdemir; Sibel Ertan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  The Homuncular Jigsaw: Investigations of Phantom Limb and Body Awareness Following Brachial Plexus Block or Avulsion.

Authors:  Mariella Pazzaglia; Erik Leemhuis; Anna Maria Giannini; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-02-03       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Concerning Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation: Occult Neural Networks.

Authors:  Yusuf Ozgur Cakmak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Altered hub configurations within default mode network following acupuncture at ST36: a multimodal investigation combining fMRI and MEG.

Authors:  Youbo You; Lijun Bai; Ruwei Dai; Hao Cheng; Zhenyu Liu; Wenjuan Wei; Jie Tian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.