Literature DB >> 11162063

Desynchronization rate in cell populations: mathematical modeling and experimental data.

G Chiorino1, J A Metz, D Tomasoni, P Ubezio.   

Abstract

We characterize the kinetics of two cancer cell lines: IGROV1 (ovarian carcinoma) and MOLT4 (leukemia). By means of flow cytometry, we selected two populations from exponentially growing in vitro cell lines, depending on the cells' DNA synthesis activity during a preceding labeling period. For these populations we determined the time course of the percentages of cells in different phases of the cycles, sampling every 3 hr for 60 hr. Initially, semi-synchronous populations quickly converged to a stable age distribution, which is typical of the cell line (at equilibrium); this desynchronization reflects the intercell variability in cell cycle duration. By matching these experimental observations to mathematical modelling, we related the convergence rate toward the asymptotic distribution (R) and the period of the phase-percentage oscillations (T), to the mean cell cycle duration and its coefficient of variation. We give two formulas involving the above-mentioned parameters. Since T and R can be drawn by fitting our data to an asymptotic formula obtained from the model, we can estimate the other two kinetic parameters. IGROV1 cells have a shorter mean cell cycle time, but higher intercell variability than the leukemia line, which takes longer to lose synchrony. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11162063     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  10 in total

1.  The application of mathematical modelling to aspects of adjuvant chemotherapy scheduling.

Authors:  E A Gaffney
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2003-10-27       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  A quantitative study of growth variability of tumour cell clones in vitro.

Authors:  C Tomelleri; E Milotti; C Dalla Pellegrina; O Perbellini; A Del Fabbro; M T Scupoli; R Chignola
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 3.  Cell cycle proliferation decisions: the impact of single cell analyses.

Authors:  Jacob P Matson; Jeanette G Cook
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.542

4.  A checkpoint-oriented cell cycle simulation model.

Authors:  David Bernard; Odile Mondesert; Aurélie Gomes; Yves Duthen; Valérie Lobjois; Sylvain Cussat-Blanc; Bernard Ducommun
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Accurate delineation of cell cycle phase transitions in living cells with PIP-FUCCI.

Authors:  Gavin D Grant; Katarzyna M Kedziora; Juanita C Limas; Jeanette Gowen Cook; Jeremy E Purvis
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  A branching process model for flow cytometry and budding index measurements in cell synchrony experiments.

Authors:  David A Orlando; Edwin S Iversen; Alexander J Hartemink; Steven B Haase
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  A mathematical model for analysis of the cell cycle in cell lines derived from human tumors.

Authors:  Britta Basse; Bruce C Baguley; Elaine S Marshall; Wayne R Joseph; Bruce van Brunt; Graeme Wake; David J N Wall
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 8.  Regulation of Cell Cycle Entry and Exit: A Single Cell Perspective.

Authors:  Hilary A Coller
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 8.915

9.  Cell cycle time series gene expression data encoded as cyclic attractors in Hopfield systems.

Authors:  Anthony Szedlak; Spencer Sims; Nicholas Smith; Giovanni Paternostro; Carlo Piermarocchi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Are Tumor Cell Lineages Solely Shaped by Mechanical Forces?

Authors:  Mathieu Leroy-Lerêtre; Giacomo Dimarco; Martine Cazales; Marie-Laure Boizeau; Bernard Ducommun; Valérie Lobjois; Pierre Degond
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.758

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.