Literature DB >> 11162038

Surgical outcomes after breast cancer surgery: measuring acute lymphedema.

M A Kosir1, C Rymal, P Koppolu, L Hryniuk, L Darga, W Du, V Rice, D Mood, S Shakoor, W Wang, J Bedoyan, A Aref, L Biernat, L Northouse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of lymphedema have used inconsistent measures and criteria. The purpose of this pilot study was to measure the onset and incidence of acute lymphedema in breast cancer survivors using strict criteria for limb evaluation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible women were those undergoing breast cancer surgery that included axillary staging and/or radiation therapy of the breast. Arm volume, strength, and flexibility were measured preoperatively and quarterly. Lymphedema was defined as a greater than 10% increase in limb volume. Additional strength and flexibility assessments were done at these times.
RESULTS: In 30 evaluable patients, half underwent modified radical mastectomy and half lumpectomy, with half of the lumpectomy patients undergoing axillary node staging. Of the 30 patients 27% were Stage 0; the rest were Stage I (27%), IIA (13%), IIB (23%), and IIIA (7%). One subject was IIIB postoperatively. There were 2 women with a 10% or greater change in limb volume; the change was detected in one woman at 3 months (5% incidence) and in the second woman at 6 months (11% incidence). Both had undergone mastectomy and axillary dissection and one of these two women had symptoms of tingling and numbness in the affected arm that began at 3 months. Overall, 35% of the sample experienced symptoms by 3 months, which included numbness, aching, and tingling of the entire upper extremity, but without volume changes. The relationship between undergoing modified radical mastectomy and experiencing symptoms in the affected limb at 3 months was significant (P = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In this interim report strict methods of measurement and limb volume comparisons detected acute lymphedema at 3 months in 5% of the sample, and at 6 months in 11% of the sample. Furthermore, symptoms were detected in 35% without volume changes at 3 months postoperatively, which may warn of lymphedema occurrence within the next 3 months. This may assist clinical evaluation of symptoms in the postoperative period and support early referral to lymphedema experts. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11162038     DOI: 10.1006/jsre.2000.6021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  9 in total

1.  Preliminary development of a lymphedema symptom assessment scale for patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Jie Deng; Sheila H Ridner; Barbara A Murphy; Mary S Dietrich
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Comparison of relative versus absolute arm size change as criteria for quantifying breast cancer-related lymphedema: the flaws in current studies and need for universal methodology.

Authors:  Marek Ancukiewicz; Cynthia L Miller; Melissa N Skolny; Jean O'Toole; Laura E Warren; Lauren S Jammallo; Michelle C Specht; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Breast cancer-related lymphedema: women's experiences with an underestimated condition.

Authors:  Roanne Thomas-MacLean; Baukje Miedema; Sue R Tatemichi
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Defining a threshold for intervention in breast cancer-related lymphedema: what level of arm volume increase predicts progression?

Authors:  Michelle C Specht; Cynthia L Miller; Tara A Russell; Nora Horick; Melissa N Skolny; Jean A O'Toole; Lauren S Jammallo; Andrzej Niemierko; Betro T Sadek; Mina N Shenouda; Dianne M Finkelstein; Barbara L Smith; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Risk is Related to Multidisciplinary Treatment and Not Surgery Alone: Results from a Large Cohort Study.

Authors:  Toan T Nguyen; Tanya L Hoskin; Elizabeth B Habermann; Andrea L Cheville; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Diagnostic Criteria for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema of the Upper Extremity: The Need for Universal Agreement.

Authors:  Yara W Kassamani; Cheryl L Brunelle; Tessa C Gillespie; Madison C Bernstein; Loryn K Bucci; Tracy Nassif; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Effectiveness of early physiotherapy to prevent lymphoedema after surgery for breast cancer: randomised, single blinded, clinical trial.

Authors:  María Torres Lacomba; María José Yuste Sánchez; Alvaro Zapico Goñi; David Prieto Merino; Orlando Mayoral del Moral; Ester Cerezo Téllez; Elena Minayo Mogollón
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-12

8.  L-Dex, arm volume, and symptom trajectories 24 months after breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Sheila H Ridner; Chirag Shah; John Boyages; Louise Koelmeyer; Nicolas Ajkay; Sarah M DeSnyder; Sarah A McLaughlin; Mary S Dietrich
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Comparison of a novel algorithm quantitatively estimating epifascial fibrosis in three-dimensional computed tomography images to other clinical lymphedema grading methods.

Authors:  Kyo-In Koo; Myoung-Hwan Ko; Yongkwan Lee; Hye Won Son; Suwon Lee; Chang Ho Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.