Literature DB >> 11161352

The simultaneous activation hypothesis: explaining recovery from deep to phonological dyslexia.

M H Southwood1, A Chatterjee.   

Abstract

Deep dyslexia evolved into phonological dyslexia in one patient. Semantic errors resolved while phonological and derivational errors persisted in reading. Nonword reading improved but remained inferior to word reading. Despite a residual semantic deficit naming improved. The Simultaneous Activation Hypothesis explains recovery from deep to phonological dyslexia and the continued dissociation between reading and naming errors. Partial recovery to all three reading routes increased constraints for word selection at the phonological output lexicon (POL) improving word reading. With recovery, the POL receives additional supportive information from the partially recovered direct oral reading route and grapheme-to-phoneme conversion (GPC) eliminating semantic errors in oral reading. Nonword reading also improved because of partial recovery to all three routes. Semantic errors in naming persisted because additional constraints were unavailable at the POL to activate a phonological entry. Phonological and derivational errors were more frequent in reading than in naming the result of incomplete GPC recovery. Residual nonword reading deficits resulted from incomplete GPC recovery, indicated by the persistence of neologisms in nonwords. The Simultaneous Activation Hypothesis readily accounts for the evolution from deep to phonological dyslexia. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11161352     DOI: 10.1006/brln.2000.2384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  2 in total

1.  Dissociations between developmental dyslexias and attention deficits.

Authors:  Limor Lukov; Naama Friedmann; Lilach Shalev; Lilach Khentov-Kraus; Nir Shalev; Rakefet Lorber; Revital Guggenheim
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-12

2.  Non-word reading, lexical retrieval and stuttering: comments on Packman, Onslow, Coombes and Goodwin (2001).

Authors:  James Au-Yeung; Peter Howell
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.346

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.