INTRODUCTION: The MS Functional Composite (MSFC), a recently developed outcome measure for MS clinical trials measuring three dimensions (ambulation/leg function, arm/hand function, and cognition), was applied to 134 patients with MS to study the concurrent validity, using MRI measurements as a biological disease marker. The results were compared to correlations between the traditionally applied Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and MRI measurements in the same patients. METHODS: The assessments of MSFC and EDSS were performed in combination with brain MRI. MRI consisted of T1- and T2-weighted images, from which the hypointense and hyperintense lesion loads were quantified. RESULTS: The MSFC score ranged from -2.54 to 0.99. The median EDSS was 3.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.5 to 6.0). The median T2-weighted lesion load was 8.4 cm(3) (IQR 3.4 to 19.8) and the median T1-weighted lesion load was 1.1 cm(3) (IQR 0.3 to 3.2). Correlations between the MSFC and both T1 (-0.24) and T2 (-0.25) lesion loads were demonstrated, but not between the EDSS and both MRI parameters. Significant correlations between MSFC components and T1 and T2 lesion loads existed for cognitive function and arm/hand function, but not for ambulation. If relapse-onset patients (relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive) were combined, the correlation between MSFC and MRI parameters became stronger for both T1 (-0.37) and T2 lesion loads (-0.35). CONCLUSIONS: The authors present the concurrent validity of the MSFC with a biological disease marker by showing correlations with MRI. Specifically, they demonstrate significant correlations with cognition and arm/hand function assessments, domains that are not well represented in the EDSS.
INTRODUCTION: The MS Functional Composite (MSFC), a recently developed outcome measure for MS clinical trials measuring three dimensions (ambulation/leg function, arm/hand function, and cognition), was applied to 134 patients with MS to study the concurrent validity, using MRI measurements as a biological disease marker. The results were compared to correlations between the traditionally applied Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and MRI measurements in the same patients. METHODS: The assessments of MSFC and EDSS were performed in combination with brain MRI. MRI consisted of T1- and T2-weighted images, from which the hypointense and hyperintense lesion loads were quantified. RESULTS: The MSFC score ranged from -2.54 to 0.99. The median EDSS was 3.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.5 to 6.0). The median T2-weighted lesion load was 8.4 cm(3) (IQR 3.4 to 19.8) and the median T1-weighted lesion load was 1.1 cm(3) (IQR 0.3 to 3.2). Correlations between the MSFC and both T1 (-0.24) and T2 (-0.25) lesion loads were demonstrated, but not between the EDSS and both MRI parameters. Significant correlations between MSFC components and T1 and T2 lesion loads existed for cognitive function and arm/hand function, but not for ambulation. If relapse-onset patients (relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive) were combined, the correlation between MSFC and MRI parameters became stronger for both T1 (-0.37) and T2 lesion loads (-0.35). CONCLUSIONS: The authors present the concurrent validity of the MSFC with a biological disease marker by showing correlations with MRI. Specifically, they demonstrate significant correlations with cognition and arm/hand function assessments, domains that are not well represented in the EDSS.
Authors: M S A Deloire; E Salort; M Bonnet; Y Arimone; M Boudineau; H Amieva; B Barroso; J-C Ouallet; C Pachai; E Galliaud; K G Petry; V Dousset; C Fabrigoule; B Brochet Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: C M Dalton; P A Brex; R Jenkins; N C Fox; K A Miszkiel; W R Crum; J I O'Riordan; G T Plant; A J Thompson; D H Miller Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 10.154