Literature DB >> 11158499

Reactogenicity and immunogenicity at preschool age of a booster dose of two three-component diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccines in children primed in infancy with acellular vaccines.

A E Tozzi1, A Anemona, P Stefanelli, S Salmaso, M L Ciofi degli Atti, P Mastrantonio, A Giammanco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a fourth dose of 2 three-component acellular pertussis vaccines combined with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) when administered at preschool age to children primed in infancy with 3 doses of the same DTaP and who had received a diphtheria-tetanus (DT) dose at the age of 12 months.
SETTING: Local health units of 4 Italian regions. STUDY
DESIGN: Three thousand five hundred twenty-two children, who had been randomized in the first year of life to be immunized with a DTaP vaccine by either SmithKline Beecham or Chiron Biocine, were offered a booster of the same vaccine or, if refusing, a DT vaccine at the age of 5 to 6 years. Families of children were aware of the vaccine administered. The occurrence of adverse events was compared between the children who received a DTaP booster and those boosted with a DT only. Antibody titers to pertussis vaccine components (pertussis toxin, filamentous hemoagglutinin, and pertactin) were determined on 558 paired sera taken before and 30 days after the DTaP booster administration.
RESULTS: Four episodes of temperature >/=39.5 degrees C, 2 in each DTaP group, were recorded. Fever >/=38 degrees C occurred infrequently in both DTaP and DT recipients (DTaP range: 2.5%-2.8%; DT range: 0%-4.8%), as did irritability (DTaP range: 10.1%-11.7%; DT range: 7.4%-12.6%). The frequency of local reactions was significantly higher for DTaP recipients (range: 44.0%-52.8%), with respect to DT recipients (range: 29.5%-44.4%). Extensive local reactions were observed in 1.2% of DTaP recipients and in.5% of DT recipients. Both DTaP vaccines induced high antibody titers against pertussis toxin, filamentous hemoagglutinin, and pertactin, with an increase of >10 times the prebooster geometric mean titers.
CONCLUSIONS: A booster dose of DTaP at preschool age in children primed with the same acellular pertussis vaccine is safe and immunogenic. However, the frequency of local reactions is higher compared with that following primary immunization and with that following booster with DT only, and parents should be informed of the potential for these reactions to occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11158499     DOI: 10.1542/peds.107.2.e25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  10 in total

1.  Th2-associated local reactions to the acellular diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine in 4- to 6-year-old children.

Authors:  Julie Rowe; Stephanie T Yerkovich; Peter Richmond; Devinda Suriyaarachchi; Elizabeth Fisher; Leonie Feddema; Richard Loh; Peter D Sly; Patrick G Holt
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 2.  Molecular pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations of respiratory infections due to Bordetella pertussis and other Bordetella subspecies.

Authors:  Seema Mattoo; James D Cherry
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  The early-onset febrile reaction following vaccination and associated factors: An exploratory sub-study based on the Ebola vaccine clinical trial.

Authors:  Qigang Dai; Qi Liang; Yuemei Hu; Fanyue Meng; Jingxin Li; Lihua Hou; Hailong Zhou; Kai Chu; Xiaokui Hu; Rong Tang; Wenjuan Wang; Jialei Hu; Haodi Huang; Zhen Li; Shuqi Yang; Fengcai Zhu
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Which strategy for pertussis vaccination today?

Authors:  Dorota Z Girard
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 5.  The complementary roles of Phase 3 trials and post-licensure surveillance in the evaluation of new vaccines.

Authors:  Pier Luigi Lopalco; Frank DeStefano
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  Active immunization in the United States: developments over the past decade.

Authors:  P H Dennehy
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Booster vaccination and 1-year follow-up of 4-8-year-old children with a reduced-antigen-content dTpa-IPV vaccine.

Authors:  Roland Sänger; Ulrich Behre; Karl-Heinz Krause; Hans-Peter Loch; Peter Soemantri; Dietmar Herrmann; Eugenie Schmitz-Hauss; Joanne Wolter; Bernard Hoet
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  The distribution over time of costs and social net benefits for pertussis immunization programs.

Authors:  Dorota Zdanowska Girard
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2009-03-18

Review 9.  What Is Wrong with Pertussis Vaccine Immunity? Inducing and Recalling Vaccine-Specific Immunity.

Authors:  Christiane S Eberhardt; Claire-Anne Siegrist
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 10.005

10.  Pertussis vaccine: a critique.

Authors:  John B Robbins; Rachel Schneerson; Jerry M Keith; Mark A Miller; Joanna Kubler-Kielb; Birger Trollfors
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.129

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.