Literature DB >> 11158491

Childhood vaccine risk/benefit communication in private practice office settings: a national survey.

T C Davis1, D D Fredrickson, C L Arnold, J T Cross, S G Humiston, K W Green, J A Bocchini.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Communication about childhood vaccine risks and benefits has been legally required in pediatric health care for over a decade. However, little is known about the actual practice of vaccine risk/benefit communication.
OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to identify current practices of childhood vaccine risk/benefit communication in private physician office settings nationally. Specifically, we wanted to determine what written materials were given, by whom, and when; what information providers thought parents wanted/needed to know, the content of nurse and doctor discussion with parents, and the time spent on discussion. We also wanted to quantify barriers to vaccine risk/benefit discussion and to prioritize materials and dissemination methods preferred as solutions to these barriers.
METHODS: We conducted 32 focus groups in 6 cities, and then administered a 27-question cross-sectional mailed survey from March to September 1998, to a random national sample of physicians and their office nurses who immunize children in private practices. Eligible survey respondents were active fellows of the American Academy of Pediatrics or American Academy of Family Physicians in private practice who immunized children and a nurse from each physician's office. After 3 mailings, the response rate was 71%.
RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of pediatricians and 72% of family physicians self-reported their offices gave parents the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vaccine Information Statement, while 62% and 58%, respectively, gave it with every dose. In ~70% of immunization visits, physicians and nurses reported initiating discussion of the following: common side effects, when to call the clinic and the immunization schedule. However, physicians reported rarely initiating discussion regarding contraindications (<50%) and the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (<10%). Lack of time was considered the greatest barrier to vaccine risk/benefit communication. Nurses reported spending significantly more time discussing vaccines with parents than pediatricians or family physicians (mean: 3.89 vs 9.20 and 3.08 minutes, respectively). Both physicians and nurses indicated an additional 60 to 90 seconds was needed to optimally discuss immunization with parents under current conditions. Stratified analysis indicated nurses played a vital role in immunization delivery and risk/benefit communication. To improve vaccine risk/benefit communication, 80% of all providers recommended a preimmunization booklet for parents and approximately one half recommended a screening sheet for contraindications and poster for immunization reference. The learning method most highly endorsed by all providers was practical materials (80%). Other desirable learning methods varied significantly by provider type.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a mismatch between the legal mandate for Vaccine Information Statement distribution and the actual practice in private office settings. The majority of providers reported discussing some aspect of vaccine communication but 40% indicated that they did not mention risks. Legal and professional guidelines for appropriate content and delivery of vaccine communication need to be clarified and to be made easily accessible for busy private practitioners. Efforts to improve risk/benefit communication in private practice should take into consideration the limited time available in an office well-infant visit and should be aimed at both the nurse and physician.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11158491     DOI: 10.1542/peds.107.2.e17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  24 in total

1.  Development of a survey to identify vaccine-hesitant parents: the parent attitudes about childhood vaccines survey.

Authors:  Douglas J Opel; Rita Mangione-Smith; James A Taylor; Carolyn Korfiatis; Cheryl Wiese; Sheryl Catz; Diane P Martin
Journal:  Hum Vaccin       Date:  2011-04-01

2.  Promoting HPV Vaccination in Safety-Net Clinics: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Jasmin A Tiro; Joanne M Sanders; Sandi L Pruitt; Clare Frey Stevens; Celette Sugg Skinner; Wendy P Bishop; Sobha Fuller; Donna Persaud
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Association of State Dense Breast Notification Laws With Supplemental Testing and Cancer Detection After Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Susan H Busch; Jessica R Hoag; Jenerius A Aminawung; Xiao Xu; Ilana B Richman; Pamela R Soulos; Kelly A Kyanko; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Awareness and utilization of reporting pathways for adverse events following immunization: online survey among pediatricians in Russia and Germany.

Authors:  Susann Muehlhans; Max von Kleist; Tatiana Gretchukha; Martin Terhardt; Ulrich Fegeler; Wolfgang Maurer; Leila Namazova-Baranova; Gerhard Gaedicke; Alexander Baranov; Barbara Rath
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  How can we communicate about vaccines with adolescents and their parents?

Authors:  Andrea L Benin; Ann C Wu; Eric S Holmboe; Eugene D Shapiro; Walter Anyan
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 1.168

6.  Previsit Screening for Parental Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Douglas J Opel; Nora Henrikson; Katherine Lepere; Rene Hawkes; Chuan Zhou; John Dunn; James A Taylor
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Attitudes and beliefs of parents concerned about vaccines: impact of timing of immunization information.

Authors:  Kirsten S Vannice; Daniel A Salmon; Irene Shui; Saad B Omer; Jennifer Kissner; Kathryn M Edwards; Robert Sparks; Cornelia L Dekker; Nicola P Klein; Deborah A Gust
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  The relationship between parent attitudes about childhood vaccines survey scores and future child immunization status: a validation study.

Authors:  Douglas J Opel; James A Taylor; Chuan Zhou; Sheryl Catz; Mon Myaing; Rita Mangione-Smith
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 16.193

9.  Knowledge influences attitudes toward vaccination in Romania.

Authors:  Diana Deleanu; Carina Petricau; Poliana Leru; Ioana Chiorean; Adriana Muntean; Dinu Dumitrascu; Irena Nedelea
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Parents' perceptions of provider communication regarding adolescent vaccines.

Authors:  Amanda F Dempsey; Jennifer Pyrzanowski; Steven Lockhart; Elizabeth Campagna; Juliana Barnard; Sean T O'Leary
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.