Literature DB >> 11157812

Disparate response of wild-type and variant forms of LH to GnRH stimulation in individuals heterozygous for the LHbeta variant allele.

C H Nilsson1, M Kaleva, H Virtanen, A M Haavisto, K Pettersson, I T Huhtaniemi.   

Abstract

There is a common genetic variant of LH due to two amino acid changes in the LHbeta subunit, Trp(8)Arg and Ile(15)Thr. In order to compare the relative activities of wild type (wt-LH) and variant LHbeta (v-LHbeta) genes in LH production and secretion, we performed gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation tests for healthy females (n = 7) and males (n = 10) heterozygous for the v-LHbeta allele. Blood samples were drawn up to 180 min after injection of GnRH. The serum samples were subjected to two immunofluorometric assays, one detecting wt hormone, the other detecting equally both LH types. The wt/total ratio increased significantly (P < or = 0.016) after GnRH injection in males. This indicates that the proportion of wt-LH increases in the circulation in men but not in women, and that women consequently secrete relatively more v-LH. An in-vitro bioassay was performed on 0 and 60 min samples, and the bio/immunoreactivity (B/I) ratio decreased in both sexes (P = 0.010-0.012). This supports the previously reported lower B/I ratio of wt. than v-LH, since wt-LH is expected to accumulate in circulation because of its longer half-life. In conclusion, these findings demonstrate that wt.- and v-LH respond differently to GnRH stimulation in men and women heterozygous for v-LHbeta. These results are in agreement with previously documented differences of the two forms in circulation, as well as with different promoter activities of the two LHbeta alleles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11157812     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.2.230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

1.  Patterns of LHbetacf among women in health and disease.

Authors:  Steven Birken; Ruth McChesney; Oksana Yershova; John Gaughan; Kim Pettersson; Geoff Rechenberg; Chung H Wu; George Taliadouros
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 4.102

2.  The common genetic variant of luteinizing hormone has a longer serum half-life than the wild type in heterozygous women.

Authors:  Leif Wide; Karin Eriksson; Patrick M Sluss; Janet E Hall
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Individualised controlled ovarian stimulation (iCOS): maximising success rates for assisted reproductive technology patients.

Authors:  Ernesto Bosch; Diego Ezcurra
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 4.  Hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers in controlled ovarian stimulation: tools for matching patients and protocols.

Authors:  Carlo Alviggi; Peter Humaidan; Diego Ezcurra
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 5.  Luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone synergy: A review of role in controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation.

Authors:  Gottumukkala Achyuta Rama Raju; Rahul Chavan; Mamata Deenadayal; Devika Gunasheela; Rohit Gutgutia; Geetha Haripriya; Mirudhubashini Govindarajan; Nayana Hitesh Patel; Ameet Shashikant Patki
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.