Literature DB >> 11157560

Intravenous apomorphine therapy in Parkinson's disease: clinical and pharmacokinetic observations.

A J Manson1, H Hanagasi, K Turner, P N Patsalos, P Carey, N Ratnaraj, A J Lees.   

Abstract

Six patients with Parkinson's disease and refractory motor fluctuations, with severe subcutaneous (s.c.) nodule formation as a result of long-term s.c. apomorphine infusions, were switched to intravenous (i.v.) therapy via a long-term in-dwelling venous catheter. Five patients were followed-up for a mean of 7 months (range 0.5-18 months). All patients had plasma apomorphine concentrations measured at baseline during s.c. infusions and three had follow-up measurements when stabilized on i.v. therapy, to test the hypothesis that motor fluctuations in these patients are largely due to impaired absorption of apomorphine. The mean i.v. rate of 9.0 mg/h (range 5-14 mg) and 24-h dose of 256.7 mg (range 90-456 mg) of apomorphine were not significantly reduced compared with the s.c. route (9.24 mg/h and 243.4 mg). However, additional oral anti-parkinsonian medication was reduced by a mean of 59%, and 'off' time was virtually eliminated (mean reduction from 5.4 to 0.5 h per day, P< 0.05). There was also a significant reduction in dyskinesias and markedly improved quality of life. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated more reliable and smoother delivery of apomorphine via the i.v. route, although 'off' periods were not always explained by low plasma apomorphine concentrations. Complication rates were high and included three unforeseen hazardous intravascular thrombotic complications, secondary to apomorphine crystal accumulation, necessitating cardiothoracic surgery. We conclude that i.v. apomorphine therapy holds promise as a more effective way of controlling motor fluctuations than the s.c. route. However, further preclinical research is required before i.v. Britaject apomorphine can be recommended for routine clinical practice. Even when stable plasma apomorphine concentrations were achieved, motor fluctuations could not be totally eradicated, suggesting that postsynaptic receptor changes may also play a role in the refractory 'off' periods in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11157560     DOI: 10.1093/brain/124.2.331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  13 in total

1.  Gold standards in pharmacovigilance: the use of definitive anecdotal reports of adverse drug reactions as pure gold and high-grade ore.

Authors:  Manfred Hauben; Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Factors to Consider in the Selection of Dopamine Agonists for Older Persons with Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Mark Dominic Latt; Simon Lewis; Olfat Zekry; Victor S C Fung
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Continuous drug delivery in early- and late-stage Parkinson's disease as a strategy for avoiding dyskinesia induction and expression.

Authors:  P Jenner; A C McCreary; D K A Scheller
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 4.  Old Drugs, New Delivery Systems in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Harsh V Gupta; Kelly E Lyons; Rajesh Pahwa
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Role of apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Allison Boyle; William Ondo
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 6.  Potential of transdermal drug delivery in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Ronald F Pfeiffer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel in advanced Parkinson's disease: final 12-month, open-label results.

Authors:  Hubert H Fernandez; David G Standaert; Robert A Hauser; Anthony E Lang; Victor S C Fung; Fabian Klostermann; Mark F Lew; Per Odin; Malcolm Steiger; Eduard Z Yakupov; Sylvain Chouinard; Oksana Suchowersky; Jordan Dubow; Coleen M Hall; Krai Chatamra; Weining Z Robieson; Janet A Benesh; Alberto J Espay
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 8.  Treatment of Parkinson's disease in the advanced stage.

Authors:  C Ossig; H Reichmann
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation in the treatment of Parkinson's disease : an update.

Authors:  Dag Nyholm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.577

Review 10.  Motor and nonmotor complications in Parkinson's disease: an argument for continuous drug delivery?

Authors:  K Ray Chaudhuri; Alexandra Rizos; Kapil D Sethi
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.