Literature DB >> 11157374

Peritoneal transport status correlates with morbidity but not longitudinal change of nutritional status of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients: a 2-year prospective study.

C C Szeto1, M C Law, T Y Wong, C B Leung, P K Li.   

Abstract

Cross-sectional studies show that peritoneal transport status is associated with nutritional status and clinical outcome of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. High transporters often are assumed to have progressive malnutrition as a result of fluid overload and nutrient loss in dialysis effluent. There are few prospective data to confirm this assumption, however. We studied 235 unselected CAPD patients to examine this possibility. There were 58 new cases and 177 prevalent cases. A standard peritoneal equilibration test was performed at enrollment. All patients were followed for 2 years. Dialysis adequacy and nutritional assessment, including serum albumin, protein nitrogen appearance, and lean body mass, were performed at 0, 12, and 24 months. Clinical outcome included hospitalization, actuarial patient survival, and technique survival. The mean age was 51.6 +/- 12.4 years. The mean 4-hour dialysate-to-plasma ratio of creatinine was 0.57 +/- 0.12 for all cases (0.60 +/- 0.12 for new cases). Patients were classified into three groups: high/high-average (H/HA) (63 cases), low-average (LA) (105 cases), and low (L) (67 cases) transporters. Baseline demographic data and total Kt/V were similar in all transport groups. There were weak correlations between 4-hour dialysate-to-plasma ratio of creatinine and baseline serum albumin (r = -0.249, P: < 0.001), protein nitrogen appearance (r = -0.190, P: < 0.01), and percentage of lean body mass (r = -0.194, P: < 0.01). The H/HA group was a specific but not a sensitive predictor of poor baseline nutritional status. There was no significant change in any nutritional indices after 2 years in new cases and prevalent cases, regardless of transport status. The differences in nutritional indices between groups remained unchanged during the study period. There was a significant difference in hospitalization rate among peritoneal transport groups (median 12 versus 7 versus 3 days per year for H/HA, LA, and L groups, Kruskal-Wallis test, P: < 0.05). The difference remained similar when new cases and prevalent cases were analyzed separately. The L group had slightly better 2-year patient survival than the H/HA group (90.2% versus 83.3%), but the result was not statistically significant. We conclude that peritoneal transport status is not associated with longitudinal change of nutritional parameters, although transport status is associated with short-term patient morbidity. Further study is needed to identify the mechanisms of poor clinical outcome in high peritoneal transporters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11157374     DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.21298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  9 in total

Review 1.  Nutrition in patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Seung-Hyeok Han; Dae-Suk Han
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  Should peritoneal resting be advised in ultrafiltration failure associated with a fast peritoneal solute transport status?

Authors:  Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Peritoneal Equilibration Test and Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Rajnish Mehrotra; Vanessa Ravel; Elani Streja; Sooraj Kuttykrishnan; Scott V Adams; Ronit Katz; Miklos Z Molnar; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  High peritoneal transport status is not an independent risk factor for high mortality in patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Tae Ik Chang; Jung Tak Park; Dong Hyung Lee; Ju Hyun Lee; Tae Hyun Yoo; Beom Seok Kim; Shin-Wook Kang; Ho Yung Lee; Kyu Hun Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 5.  Peritoneal changes in patients on long-term peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Raymond T Krediet; Dirk G Struijk
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 28.314

6.  Duration of Hemodialysis Following Peritoneal Dialysis Cessation in Australia and New Zealand: Proposal for a Standardized Definition of Technique Failure.

Authors:  Patrick G Lan; Philip A Clayton; David W Johnson; Stephen P McDonald; Monique Borlace; Sunil V Badve; Kamal Sud; Neil Boudville
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Clinical outcomes and mortality in elderly peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Tamer Sakacı; Elbis Ahbap; Yener Koc; Taner Basturk; Zuhal Atan Ucar; Ayse Sınangıl; Mustafa Sevınc; Ekrem Kara; Cuneyt Akgol; Arzu Ozdemır Kayalar; Feyza Bayraktar Caglayan; Tuncay Sahutoglu; Abdulkadir Ünsal
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  High peritoneal transport status was not associated with mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Naya Huang; Jiehui Chen; Li Fan; Qian Zhou; Qingdong Xu; Ricong Xu; Liping Xiong; Xueqing Yu; Haiping Mao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Peritoneal Protein Loss Is Not Associated With Sarcopenia in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  Jun Young Do; A Young Kim; Seok Hui Kang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.