Literature DB >> 11156091

Repair of interrupted aortic arch: results after more than 20 years.

C Schreiber1, A Eicken, M Vogt, T Günther, M Wottke, M Thielmann, S U Paek, H Meisner, J Hess, R Lange.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study focused on the influence of concomitant anomalies, the individual surgical approach, and the probability for reinterventions.
METHODS: Between 1975 and 1999, 94 patients with interrupted aortic arch were evaluated for short- and long-term results after surgical treatment.
RESULTS: Interrupted aortic arch was associated mainly with a ventricular septal defect (85%) and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO, 13%). Mean follow-up was 6.7 years (median 6.9 years, 628.4 patient years). A single-stage operation was performed in 76 cases. Early mortality for two-stage procedures was 37% and late mortality was 26%, compared with single-stage procedures, with an early mortality of 12% and a late mortality of 20%, respectively. Early mortality in patients with additional LVOTO was 42% and late mortality was 50%. Freedom from reoperation at 5 years was 62%, and at 10 years was 49%. Reinterventions were performed mainly for residual arch stenosis, also with bronchus or tracheal compression, or LVOTO.
CONCLUSIONS: Arch continuity and repair of associated anomalies can be achieved with an acceptable overall risk in this often complex entity. Associated anomalies play an important role in the outcome. Single-stage repair with primary anastomosis of the arch should be the surgical goal. The long-term probability for reoperation is high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11156091     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01858-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  8 in total

1.  Complete aortic arch obstruction: interruption or aortic coarctation?

Authors:  J W J Vriend; J Lam; B J M Mulder
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Surgery for aortic arch disease in the neonate.

Authors:  Frank A Pigula
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Altered 4-D magnetic resonance imaging flow characteristics in complex congenital aortic arch repair.

Authors:  Lajja P Desai; Haben Berhane; Nazia Husain; Joshua D Robinson; Cynthia K Rigsby; Michael Markl
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-08-31

4.  Hybrid palliation of interrupted aortic arch in a high-risk neonate.

Authors:  Mohsen Karimi; Ahmed Farouk; Alex Golden; Robert Gilkeson
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2010-01

Review 5.  Role of CT in the Pre- and Postoperative Assessment of Conotruncal Anomalies.

Authors:  Parveen Kumar; Mona Bhatia
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2022-06-30

6.  Morbidity in children and adolescents after surgical correction of interrupted aortic arch.

Authors:  Michael L O'Byrne; Laura Mercer-Rosa; Huaqing Zhao; Xuemei Zhang; Wei Yang; Ronn E Tanel; Bradley S Marino; Amy Cassedy; Mark A Fogel; Jack Rychik; Stephen Paridon; Elizabeth Goldmuntz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 1.655

7.  Mechanical cause for acute left lung atelectasis after neonatal aortic arch repair with arterial switch operation: Conservative management.

Authors:  Madan Mohan Maddali; Pranav Subbaraya Kandachar; Said Al-Hanshi; Mohammed Al Ghafri; John Valliattu
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

8.  Interrupted Aortic Arch in a Patient with Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch after Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Ziv Beckerman; LaRonica McPherson; Edward P Chen
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2020-02-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.