BACKGROUND: There is limited information available from clinical trials regarding the performance of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, split-mouth study was designed to compare the clinical and radiographical effects of EMD treatment to that of placebo-controlled treatment for intrabony defects. METHODS:Sixteen patients were included, each of whom had 1 or 2 pairs of intrabony defects located contralaterally in the same arch. Thirty-six intrabony defects were randomly assigned treatment with flap surgery plus EMD or flap surgery plus placebo. At baseline and at the 12-month follow-up evaluation visit, clinical and radiographic measurements were determined. Data were statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon-signed rank test (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: At the 12-month visit, bleeding on probing for the EMD group was 0.11 +/- 0.32 compared to the placebo group, 0.61 +/- 0.50 (P <0.05). Probing depth reduction was greater in the EMD group (3.00 +/- 0.97 mm) compared to the placebo group (2.22 +/- 0.81 mm) (P <0.05). Mean values for clinical attachment gain in the EMD and the placebo groups were 1.72 +/- 1.07 mm and 0.83 +/- 0.86 mm, respectively (P <0.05). Vertical relative attachment gain was 38.5 +/- 22.6% in the EMD group and 21.4 +/- 25.2% in the placebo group (P<0.05). Radiographic bone density gain was greater in the EMD (20.2 +/- 16.6%) compared to the placebo group (-3.94 +/- 23.3%) (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with flap surgery and EMD, compared to flap surgery with placebo, produced a significantly more favorable clinical improvement in intrabony periodontal defects.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There is limited information available from clinical trials regarding the performance of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, split-mouth study was designed to compare the clinical and radiographical effects of EMD treatment to that of placebo-controlled treatment for intrabony defects. METHODS: Sixteen patients were included, each of whom had 1 or 2 pairs of intrabony defects located contralaterally in the same arch. Thirty-six intrabony defects were randomly assigned treatment with flap surgery plus EMD or flap surgery plus placebo. At baseline and at the 12-month follow-up evaluation visit, clinical and radiographic measurements were determined. Data were statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon-signed rank test (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: At the 12-month visit, bleeding on probing for the EMD group was 0.11 +/- 0.32 compared to the placebo group, 0.61 +/- 0.50 (P <0.05). Probing depth reduction was greater in the EMD group (3.00 +/- 0.97 mm) compared to the placebo group (2.22 +/- 0.81 mm) (P <0.05). Mean values for clinical attachment gain in the EMD and the placebo groups were 1.72 +/- 1.07 mm and 0.83 +/- 0.86 mm, respectively (P <0.05). Vertical relative attachment gain was 38.5 +/- 22.6% in the EMD group and 21.4 +/- 25.2% in the placebo group (P<0.05). Radiographic bone density gain was greater in the EMD (20.2 +/- 16.6%) compared to the placebo group (-3.94 +/- 23.3%) (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with flap surgery and EMD, compared to flap surgery with placebo, produced a significantly more favorable clinical improvement in intrabony periodontal defects.
Authors: Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Nikolaos Papanikolaou; Paul Coulthard; Helen V Worthington Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-10-07