N Gleicher1, V Karande. 1. Center for Human Reproduction, Chicago, Illinois 60610, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A large part of infertility treatment involves the use of exogenous gonadotropins. The last decade has seen a progressive switch from human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG), the original gonadotropin product, to progressively more costly products, primarily or exclusively containing follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Though obviously at least in part driven by marketing efforts of pharmaceutical companies, this switch has received relatively little scrutiny despite its obvious cost implications. We therefore investigated whether a switch back to a generic or less costly hMG-driven ovulation induction protocol would affect patient outcome after ovulation induction and, by implications, with other assisted reproductive technologies. METHODS: We prospectively studied clinical pregnancy rates in a large number of consecutive ovulation induction cycles in a well-defined patient population (group 1) which, after October of 1997, had been switched from a predominantly FSH to an hMG-driven protocol, based on an institutional formulary change. Until a transition period (between July and September 1997), this patient population had been on a primarily FSH-driven protocol (between July 1996 and June 1997). In parallel, we evaluated a second patient population (group 2), which was managed by the same physicians outside of formulary requirements and remained almost exclusively on principally FSH-driven ovulation induction cycles. RESULTS: FSH- and hMG-driven ovulation induction protocols did not differ in pregnancy outcome during the prospective study period. Group 1 patients, however, demonstrated a significant increase in pregnancy rates after the switch from FSH to hMG stimulation had taken place (P = 0.02), while group 2 patients demonstrated no change in pregnancy rate during the same time period. CONCLUSIONS: Generic hMG products do not adversely affect pregnancy rates in comparison to more costly FSH products in routine ovulation induction cycles and should be considered an appropriate alternative to more expensive FSH products.
PURPOSE: A large part of infertility treatment involves the use of exogenous gonadotropins. The last decade has seen a progressive switch from human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG), the original gonadotropin product, to progressively more costly products, primarily or exclusively containing follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Though obviously at least in part driven by marketing efforts of pharmaceutical companies, this switch has received relatively little scrutiny despite its obvious cost implications. We therefore investigated whether a switch back to a generic or less costly hMG-driven ovulation induction protocol would affect patient outcome after ovulation induction and, by implications, with other assisted reproductive technologies. METHODS: We prospectively studied clinical pregnancy rates in a large number of consecutive ovulation induction cycles in a well-defined patient population (group 1) which, after October of 1997, had been switched from a predominantly FSH to an hMG-driven protocol, based on an institutional formulary change. Until a transition period (between July and September 1997), this patient population had been on a primarily FSH-driven protocol (between July 1996 and June 1997). In parallel, we evaluated a second patient population (group 2), which was managed by the same physicians outside of formulary requirements and remained almost exclusively on principally FSH-driven ovulation induction cycles. RESULTS: FSH- and hMG-driven ovulation induction protocols did not differ in pregnancy outcome during the prospective study period. Group 1 patients, however, demonstrated a significant increase in pregnancy rates after the switch from FSH to hMG stimulation had taken place (P = 0.02), while group 2 patients demonstrated no change in pregnancy rate during the same time period. CONCLUSIONS: Generic hMG products do not adversely affect pregnancy rates in comparison to more costly FSH products in routine ovulation induction cycles and should be considered an appropriate alternative to more expensive FSH products.
Authors: V C Karande; R Rao; D E Pratt; M Balin; S Levrant; R Morris; A Dudkeiwicz; N Gleicher Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 7.329