Literature DB >> 11155058

Long-term follow-up data from the Shunt Design Trial.

J Kestle1, J Drake, R Milner, C Sainte-Rose, G Cinalli, F Boop, J Piatt, S Haines, S Schiff, D Cochrane, P Steinbok, N MacNeil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A previously reported multicenter randomized trial assessed whether 2 new shunt valve designs would reduce shunt failure rates compared to differential pressure valves. The study did not show a significant difference in the time to first shunt failure. Patients entered the trial between October 1, 1993, and October 31, 1995. The primary results were based on the patients' status as of October 31, 1996 (a minimum follow-up of 1 year). This report describes the late complications based on the patients' most recent follow-up.
METHODS: Three hundred and forty-four hydrocephalic children at 12 North American and European centers were randomized to 1 of 3 valves: a standard differential pressure valve; a Delta valve (PS Medical-Medtronic) or a Sigma valve (NMT Cordis). Patients were followed until their first shunt failure. Shunt failure was defined as shunt surgery for obstruction, overdrainage, loculation or infection. If the shunt did not fail, follow-up was continued until August 31, 1999.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-seven patients had shunt failure. Shunt obstruction occurred in 131, overdrainage in 13, loculated ventricles in 2 and infection in 29. The overall shunt survival was 62% at 1 year, 52% at 2 years, 46% at 3 years, 41% at 4 years. The survival curves for the 3 valves were similar to those from the original trial and did not show a survival advantage for any particular valve.
CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged follow-up to date does not alter the primary conclusions of the trial: there does not appear to be one valve that is clearly the best for the initial treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11155058     DOI: 10.1159/000055960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg        ISSN: 1016-2291            Impact factor:   1.162


  71 in total

1.  Can using a peel-away sheath in shunt implantation prevent ventricular catheter obstruction?

Authors:  Mahmut Camlar; Yusuf Ersahin; Fusun Demirçivi Ozer; Fatih Sen; Mehmet Orman
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Prophylactic antibiotics in pediatric shunt surgery.

Authors:  N Biyani; G Grisaru-Soen; P Steinbok; S Sgouros; S Constantini
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Third ventriculostomy vs ventriculoperitoneal shunt in pediatric obstructive hydrocephalus: results from a Swiss series and literature review.

Authors:  Sandrine de Ribaupierre; B Rilliet; O Vernet; L Regli; J-G Villemure
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Laparoscopic versus open approach for implantation of the peritoneal catheter during ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement.

Authors:  Joshua L Argo; Durgamani K Yellumahanthi; Naveen Ballem; Mark R Harrigan; Winfield S Fisher; Mary M Wesley; Tracy H Taylor; Ronald H Clements
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Development of Microfabricated Magnetic Actuators for Removing Cellular Occlusion.

Authors:  Selene A Lee; Hyowon Lee; James R Pinney; Elvira Khialeeva; Marvin Bergsneider; Jack W Judy
Journal:  J Micromech Microeng       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.881

6.  Perforation holes in ventricular catheters--is less more?

Authors:  Ulrich W Thomale; Henning Hosch; Arend Koch; Matthias Schulz; Giesela Stoltenburg; Ernst-Johannes Haberl; Christian Sprung
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  International Infant Hydrocephalus Study: initial results of a prospective, multicenter comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and shunt for infant hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Abhaya V Kulkarni; Spyros Sgouros; Shlomi Constantini
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Few Patient, Treatment, and Diagnostic or Microbiological Factors, Except Complications and Intermittent Negative Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Cultures During First CSF Shunt Infection, Are Associated With Reinfection.

Authors:  Tamara D Simon; Nicole Mayer-Hamblett; Kathryn B Whitlock; Marcie Langley; John R W Kestle; Jay Riva-Cambrin; Margaret Rosenfeld; Emily A Thorell
Journal:  J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.164

9.  Relationship of causative organism and time to infection among children with cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection.

Authors:  Matthew R Test; Kathryn B Whitlock; Marcie Langley; Jay Riva-Cambrin; John R W Kestle; Tamara D Simon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Protective effect of rifampicin and clindamycin impregnated devices against Staphylococcus spp. infection after cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures.

Authors:  Raquel Gutiérrez-González; Gregorio R Boto; Cristina Fernández-Pérez; Náyade del Prado
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.