Literature DB >> 11154957

Electronic patient records and the impact of the Internet.

C Safran1, H Goldberg.   

Abstract

The term electronic patient record (EPR) means the electronic collection of clinical narrative and diagnostic reports specific to an individual patient. A true EPR should allow physicians and nurses to practice in a paperless fashion. The wide adoption of Internet technologies should allow truly distributed sharing of patient data across traditional organizational barriers. Hence, the meaning of an EPR, as a representation of documents, should be transformed into a collaborative environment that supports workflow, enables new care models and allows secure access to distributed health data. This paper reviews the current realization of EPRs in the context of paper-based medical records. The Internet architecture that Boston-based medical informatics researchers refer to as W3-EMRS is described in the context of a successful implementation of CareWeb at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical center. Finally, we describe how this Internet-based approach can be extended beyond the boundaries of traditional care settings to help evolve new collaborative models of eHealth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11154957     DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(00)00106-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  11 in total

Review 1.  The internet.

Authors:  R Al-Shahi; M Sadler; G Rees; D Bateman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Choosing the most efficient database for a web-based system to store and exchange ophthalmologic health records.

Authors:  Isabel de la Torre; Francisco Javier Díaz; Miriam Antón; Jose Fernando Díez; Beatriz Sainz; Miguel López; Roberto Hornero; María Isabel López
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  An electronic documentation system increases diagnostic code capture for very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  P J Porcelli
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

4.  A study on agent-based secure scheme for electronic medical record system.

Authors:  Tzer-Long Chen; Yu-Fang Chung; Frank Y S Lin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Attitudes toward inter-hospital electronic patient record exchange: discrepancies among physicians, medical record staff, and patients.

Authors:  Jong-Yi Wang; Hsiao-Yun Ho; Jen-De Chen; Sinkuo Chai; Chih-Jaan Tai; Yung-Fu Chen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Factors associated with adoption of the electronic health record system among primary care physicians.

Authors:  Clement Sk Cheung; Ellen Lh Tong; Ngai Tseung Cheung; Wai Man Chan; Harry Hx Wang; Mandy Wm Kwan; Carmen Km Fan; Kirin Ql Liu; Martin Cs Wong
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2013-08-26

7.  Analysis of E-mental health research: mapping the relationship between information technology and mental healthcare.

Authors:  Tatsawan Timakum; Qing Xie; Min Song
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  What is eHealth (6): perspectives on the evolution of eHealth research.

Authors:  David K Ahern; Jennifer M Kreslake; Judith M Phalen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  Reviewing the integration of patient data: how systems are evolving in practice to meet patient needs.

Authors:  Ricardo J Cruz-Correia; Pedro M Vieira-Marques; Ana M Ferreira; Filipa C Almeida; Jeremy C Wyatt; Altamiro M Costa-Pereira
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  An Assessment of Health Information Systems Through the Perspective of Computer Engineering Students and Medical Students.

Authors:  Esra Sevimli; Elif Naz Altingoz; Nur Şisman Kitapci; Okan Cem Kitapci; Leyla Koksal; Meral Yay; Pınar Kilic Aksu; Gonca Mumcu
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.