Literature DB >> 11154544

Retroperitoneal endoscopically assisted minilaparotomy for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: technical feasibility and complications.

N Boos1, F Kalberer, O Schoeb.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Description of a novel less invasive technique and prospective evaluation of associated morbidity and potential complications.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of a novel endoscope-assisted retroperitoneal approach (REAM) for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally and less invasive approaches are currently favored to perform ALIF. However, the present endoscopic techniques have not found widespread acceptance, because they are technically demanding, and microsurgical techniques are not time effective when two separate approaches are needed for L5-S1 (transperitoneal) and L4-L5 (retroperitoneal).
METHODS: The authors have developed the technique of REAM, which consists of three stages: 1) endoscopic retroperitoneal mobilization of the peritoneal sac, 2) midline minilaparotomy (4-6 cm), and 3) standard open anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Twenty patients were prospectively enrolled in this study and perioperative data (i.e., blood loss, operative time, intra- and postoperative complications) were collected to assess the feasibility of this approach.
RESULTS: Six single-level and 14 two-level ALIFs from L3-L4 to L5-S1 were performed with a mean operative time of 108 minutes (range, 85-150) and an average estimated blood loss of 200 mL (range, 50-500). The follow-up (range, 12-29 months) on 20 patients showed that there were no perioperative or postoperative complications related directly to this approach.
CONCLUSION: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion by REAM can be performed without additional hazard to the patient and appears to be a reasonable alternative to existing less invasive procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11154544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  2 in total

1.  "Does size matter?"A comparison of balloon-assisted less-invasive vs conventional retroperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Najma Farooq; Michael P Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Endoscopic spinal tethered cord release: operative technique.

Authors:  Xiao Di
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 1.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.