Literature DB >> 11154004

The Phenix expandable prosthesis: early American experience.

R M Wilkins1, A Soubeiran.   

Abstract

One of the major dilemmas in limb preservation in skeletally immature children involves the ability to maintain leg length equality. Many attempts have been made to design a prosthesis that could be expanded easily either nonoperatively or through a minor surgical procedure. Most of these designs have had mechanical difficulty or the lengthening procedure becomes a major surgical endeavor. The Phenix technology has been used in France for several years. The basic principle involves storage of energy in a spring which is maintained compressed by an original locking system. Once implanted, prosthetic lengthening is achieved via exposure to an external electromagnetic field that pilots the locking system and allows controlled release of the spring energy. Seven Phenix prostheses have been implanted in six patients. All patients had been treated for Stage II-B osteosarcoma. Six of the seven prostheses were implanted during revision procedures in salvage situations; one prosthesis was implanted during an index procedure. The surgical procedures were completed without complications. One patient sustained a fracture of the prosthesis in a fall and had an infection develop after implantation of the second prosthesis. Twenty-one expansions have been performed in six patients (mean lengthening at each procedure, 8 mm). There were no acute complications attributable to the lengthening procedure. Prosthetic expansions required an average of 20 to 30 seconds and were accompanied by very mild discomfort, if any. Most patients were given an oral analgesic either before or during the lengthening procedure. The Phenix prosthesis shows promise in handling the difficult problem of limb preservation in a growing child. Additional investigation is underway regarding limb lengthening and other dynamic applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11154004     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200101000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  11 in total

Review 1.  Limb salvage in the skeletally immature patient.

Authors:  Valerae O Lewis
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  CORR Insights(®): Are Complications Associated With the Repiphysis(®) Expandable Distal Femoral Prosthesis Acceptable for Its Continued Use?

Authors:  Felasfa M Wodajo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Are Complications Associated With the Repiphysis(®) Expandable Distal Femoral Prosthesis Acceptable for Its Continued Use?

Authors:  Eric L Staals; Marco Colangeli; Nikolin Ali; José M Casanova; Davide M Donati; Marco Manfrini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  State-of-the-art approach for bone sarcomas.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Andrea Angelini; Christos Vottis; Emanuela Palmerini; Eugenio Rimondi; Giuseppe Rossi; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-03

5.  Limb salvage surgery in bone tumors: a retrospective study of 50 cases in a single center.

Authors:  Ashutosh Chauhan; G R Joshi; B K Chopra; Manomoy Ganguly; G R Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-03-20

6.  Non-invasive expandable prosthesis in musculoskeletal oncology paediatric patients for the distal and proximal femur. First results.

Authors:  Ferran Torner; Josep M Segur; Rosendo Ullot; Francisco Soldado; Pedro Domenech; Lydia DeSena; Jorge Knorr
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Tibial Growth Disturbance Following Distal Femoral Resection and Expandable Endoprosthetic Reconstruction.

Authors:  Annie Arteau; Valerae O Lewis; Bryan S Moon; Robert L Satcher; Justin E Bird; Patrick P Lin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Expandable Total Humeral Replacement in a Child with Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Eric R Henderson; Jidi Gao; John Groundland; Odion Binitie; G Douglas Letson
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2015-05-18

Review 9.  From amputation to limb salvage reconstruction: evolution and role of the endoprosthesis in musculoskeletal oncology.

Authors:  John S Hwang; Anokhi D Mehta; Richard S Yoon; Kathleen S Beebe
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-09-22

10.  Results of 20 consecutive patients treated with the Repiphysis expandable prosthesis for primary malignant bone.

Authors:  Joseph Benevenia; Francis Patterson; Kathleen Beebe; Kimberly Tucker; Jeffrey Moore; Joseph Ippolito; Steven Rivero
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-12-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.