Literature DB >> 11153719

Neurotoxic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus disrupt auditory-cued trace heart rate (fear) conditioning in rabbits.

M D McEchron1, W Tseng, J F Disterhoft.   

Abstract

The first experiment in this study used the classical heart rate (HR) conditioning paradigm to determine if rabbits could associate an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) and a fear-producing shock-unconditioned stimulus (US) separated by an empty 10-s trace interval. Trace conditioned rabbits (n = 7) acquired significant bradycardiac conditioned HR responses on CS-alone test trials during a single 35-trial conditioning session. Control animals (n = 7) which received unpaired CSs and USs did not show HR conditioning. During a retention session of CS-alone trials 24 h after the conditioning session, some trace-conditioned animals showed conditioned HR responses immediately following CS onset (n = 3), while others showed responses appropriately timed to the US onset (n = 4) used in trace conditioning 24 h earlier. Thus, rabbits remember the duration of the long 10-s trace interval 24 h after a single day of training. The second part of this study sought to determine if cells in the dorsal hippocampus play a role in trace HR conditioning. Rabbits were given bilateral ibotenic acid lesions in the neocortex (n = 7) or dorsal hippocampus (n = 8). During trace conditioning and retention, neocortical animals showed conditioned HR responses to the CS, whereas the hippocampal group showed no significant HR conditioning. One week after trace conditioning, the same animals received a delay HR conditioning session where no trace interval separated the CS and US. During delay conditioning, hippocampal animals showed significant conditioned HR responses to the CS that were similar to the neocortical group. Thus, the dorsal hippocampus plays a critical role in rabbit HR conditioning when the CS and US are separated by a 10-s trace interval. This paradigm may be ideal for in vivo electrophysiological recording studies because rabbits are easily immobilized during the testing procedure, and learning occurs during a single day of training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11153719     DOI: 10.1002/1098-1063(2000)10:6<739::AID-HIPO1011>3.0.CO;2-I

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  33 in total

1.  Trace but not delay fear conditioning requires attention and the anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  C J Han; Colm M O'Tuathaigh; Laurent van Trigt; Jennifer J Quinn; Michael S Fanselow; Raymond Mongeau; Christof Koch; David J Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Memory traces of trace memories: neurogenesis, synaptogenesis and awareness.

Authors:  Tracey J Shors
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Timing of fear expression in trace and delay conditioning measured by fear-potentiated startle in rats.

Authors:  Michael A Burman; Jonathan C Gewirtz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Role of corticosterone in trace and delay conditioned fear-potentiated startle in rats.

Authors:  Michael A Burman; Kathryn L Hamilton; Jonathan C Gewirtz
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Extinguishing trace fear engages the retrosplenial cortex rather than the amygdala.

Authors:  Janine L Kwapis; Timothy J Jarome; Jonathan L Lee; Marieke R Gilmartin; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  Trace and long-delay fear conditioning in the developing rat.

Authors:  Robert C Barnet; Pamela S Hunt
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Hippocampal neural progenitor cells play a distinct role in fear memory retrieval in male and female CIE rats.

Authors:  McKenzie J Fannon; Karthik K Mysore; Jefferson Williams; Leon W Quach; Dvijen C Purohit; Britta D Sibley; Janna S Sage-Sepulveda; Khush M Kharidia; Roberto J Morales Silva; Michael J Terranova; Sucharita S Somkuwar; Miranda C Staples; Chitra D Mandyam
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Deficits in trace cued fear conditioning in galanin-treated rats and galanin-overexpressing transgenic mice.

Authors:  Jefferson W Kinney; Grzegorz Starosta; Andrew Holmes; Craige C Wrenn; Rebecca J Yang; Ashley P Harris; Katharine C Long; Jacqueline N Crawley
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Genetic background differences and nonassociative effects in mouse trace fear conditioning.

Authors:  Dani R Smith; Michela Gallagher; Mark E Stanton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Auditory trace fear conditioning requires perirhinal cortex.

Authors:  D B Kholodar-Smith; P Boguszewski; T H Brown
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.