Literature DB >> 11152265

Analytical ultracentrifugation in a Gibbsian perspective.

H Eisenberg1.   

Abstract

The analytical ultracentrifuge has come into new intensive use following complete instrumental redesign and the use of advanced computer technologies for the analysis and interpretation of experimental results. Major attention is now devoted to the evaluation of interactions between similar and dissimilar biological macromolecules in dilute and concentrated systems. Electrostatically charged biological solute systems additionally comprise low molecular weight charged and non-charged cosolvents. Solvent/cosolvent interactions, insufficiently considered in most current analytical ultracentrifugation analyses, may quantitatively affect solute/solute interactions. For comprehensive analysis the Svedberg derivation considering a buoyant molar mass (1 - rho0 partial specific volume)M2 and valid at vanishing solute concentration for strictly two component systems only, should be replaced, following classical thermodynamic analysis, by the ratio (delta rho/delta c2)(mu)/d pi/dc2 of the density increment at constant chemical potential of diffusible cosolvents, to the derivative of the osmotic pressure with solute concentration. Disregard of the solvent/cosolvent and solute/cosolvent interactions should be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11152265     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4622(00)00205-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys Chem        ISSN: 0301-4622            Impact factor:   2.352


  5 in total

1.  Adair was right in his time.

Authors:  Henryk Eisenberg
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Modern analytical ultracentrifugation in protein science: look forward, not back.

Authors:  Henryk Eisenberg
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Analytical ultracentrifugation: sedimentation velocity and sedimentation equilibrium.

Authors:  James L Cole; Jeffrey W Lary; Thomas P Moody; Thomas M Laue
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.441

4.  Yeast mitochondrial ADP/ATP carriers are monomeric in detergents.

Authors:  Lisa Bamber; Marilyn Harding; P Jonathan G Butler; Edmund R S Kunji
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Density contrast sedimentation velocity for the determination of protein partial-specific volumes.

Authors:  Patrick H Brown; Andrea Balbo; Huaying Zhao; Christine Ebel; Peter Schuck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.