Literature DB >> 11152053

Integrity and research: introducing the concept of dual blindness. how blind are double-blind clinical trials in alternative medicine?

O Caspi1, C Millen, L Sechrest.   

Abstract

Double-blind methodology is used in clinical studies to control for potential external or nonspecific influences such as belief and expectation, as well as to maintain as much objectivity as possible on the part of the researchers. Despite not being feasible in all medical disciplines, as in the case of some modalities of complementary and alternative medicine, there are numerous studies that spuriously claim its use. Distinctions and standards therefore need to be set to avoid misleading information. We propose a new term in research methodology, dual-blind, to describe a methodological alternative in which the caregiver is not blind but the patient and an external evaluator/investigator are. The term double-blind should be used strictly to describe a methodology in which both the patient and the caregiver are blind. Making the distinction between these two terms will result in more reliable reports of clinical trials and will support integrity in research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11152053     DOI: 10.1089/acm.2000.6.493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Altern Complement Med        ISSN: 1075-5535            Impact factor:   2.579


  4 in total

1.  External bioenergy-induced increases in intracellular free calcium concentrations are mediated by Na+/Ca2+ exchanger and L-type calcium channel.

Authors:  Juliann G Kiang; John A Ives; Wayne B Jonas
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 2.  Is complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) cost-effective? A systematic review.

Authors:  Patricia M Herman; Benjamin M Craig; Opher Caspi
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 3.659

Review 3.  Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review.

Authors:  D 'Alessandro Giandomenico; Ruffini Nuria; Aquino Alessandro; Galli Matteo; Innocenti Mattia; Tramontano Marco; Cerritelli Francesco
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 4.612

Review 4.  Osteopathic intervention in chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul J Orrock; Stephen P Myers
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.