Literature DB >> 11151556

Variation in home-birth rates between midwifery practices in The Netherlands.

T A Wiegers1, J van der Zee, J J Kerssens, M J Keirse.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the reasons for the variation in home-birth rates between midwifery practices.
METHOD: Multi-level analysis of client and midwife associated, case-specific and structural factors in relation to 4420 planned and actual home or hospital births in 42 midwifery practices.
FINDINGS: Women's choice of birth location and the occurrence of complications that lead to referral to specialist care before or during labour, were found to be the main determinants of the home-birth rate. Yet, about 64% of the variation between midwifery practices is explained by midwife and practice characteristics. Higher home-birth rates were associated with a positive attitude to home-birth, a critical attitude to hospital birth for non-medical reasons, and good co-operation between midwifery practices and hospital obstetricians.
CONCLUSIONS: The proportions of planned hospital birth and of referral to specialist care are the most important predictors of the actual hospital-birth rate of women receiving midwifery care. Both can be influenced by the midwife through a positive attitude to home-birth, a critical approach to non-medical reasons for hospital birth, and good co-operation with specialist obstetricians. It is, therefore, important for midwives to be aware of the influence that their own attitudes may have on the choices their clients make about home or hospital birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11151556     DOI: 10.1054/midw.1999.0195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  6 in total

1.  UK childbirth delivery options in 2001-2002: alternatives to consultant unit booking and delivery.

Authors:  Lindsay Fp Smith; Caroline P Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Variation in referrals to secondary obstetrician-led care among primary midwifery care practices in the Netherlands: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Pien M Offerhaus; Caroline Geerts; Ank de Jonge; Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Jos W R Twisk; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 3.  Costing Alternative Birth Settings for Women at Low Risk of Complications: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vanessa Scarf; Christine Catling; Rosalie Viney; Caroline Homer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pregnancy related anxiety and general anxious or depressed mood and the choice for birth setting: a secondary data-analysis of the DELIVER study.

Authors:  A B Witteveen; P De Cock; A C Huizink; A De Jonge; T Klomp; M Westerneng; C C Geerts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Cost analysis of the Dutch obstetric system: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth--a prospective non-randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Marijke Jc Hendrix; Silvia Maa Evers; Marloes Cm Basten; Jan G Nijhuis; Johan L Severens
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Darie O A Daemers; Evelien B M van Limbeek; Hennie A A Wijnen; Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze; Raymond G de Vries
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.