Literature DB >> 11151309

The increasing necessity for market-based pharmaceutical prices.

J E Calfee1.   

Abstract

In most markets, research and development are driven by expected prices, and those prices are determined mainly by consumer willingness to pay for the potential benefits of new products. In the pharmaceutical market, however, the dominant role of government and tax-induced insurance has tended to create a wedge between expected prices and consumer willingness to pay to cure or prevent disease. This distorts investment decisions, tending to cause underinvestment. Recent developments have expanded this gap. The greatly enhanced efficiency of pharmaceutical research has permitted the development of products that provide long term prevention and quality-of-life improvements. While some of these new products can delay or obviate chronic conditions of old age, they do not necessarily reduce healthcare costs (at least not in the short or medium run). Most of the massive benefits of the new research streams are therefore pure consumer benefits, with little benefit for the acute care activities that are the core functions of European and American healthcare delivery or payment systems. These new products are very expensive, despite increased research efficiency, because that efficiency has permitted the industry to address difficult problems that had previously been impervious to solution. To serve consumers well, healthcare providers would have to increase expenditures and prices or taxes to cover these added pharmaceutical costs. But the new products are likely to be perceived mainly as cost increases. The effect is that healthcare entities will become less suited to serve as agents for consumers. One reason is that the most natural, reliable and widely used metrics for evaluating new drugs--healthcare savings and acute care improvements--will be increasingly irrelevant. The implication is that, to a much greater extent than in the past, only market-determined prices can provide adequate signals for future pharmaceutical research investment. The failure to use market prices could deprive consumers of very large future benefits.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11151309     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200018001-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  24 in total

1.  The distribution of sales revenues from pharmaceutical innovation.

Authors:  H G Grabowski; J Vernon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Statins being prescribed for those "least in need".

Authors:  B Christie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-27

4.  Inadequate management of blood pressure in a hypertensive population.

Authors:  D R Berlowitz; A S Ash; E C Hickey; R H Friedman; M Glickman; B Kader; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Pharmacotherapy for obesity.

Authors:  D F Williamson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-01-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Changing disease definitions: implications for disease prevalence. Analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994.

Authors:  L M Schwartz; S Woloshin
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

7.  Clinical outcomes in statin treatment trials: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S D Ross; I E Allen; J E Connelly; B M Korenblat; M E Smith; D Bishop; D Luo
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999 Aug 9-23

8.  Workplace performance effects from chronic depression and its treatment.

Authors:  E R Berndt; S N Finkelstein; P E Greenberg; R H Howland; A Keith; A J Rush; J Russell; M B Keller
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Lifetime health and economic consequences of obesity.

Authors:  D Thompson; J Edelsberg; G A Colditz; A P Bird; G Oster
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999-10-11

10.  British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summary.

Authors:  L E Ramsay; B Williams; G D Johnston; G A MacGregor; L Poston; J F Potter; N R Poulter; G Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-04
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The role of marketing in pharmaceutical research and development.

Authors:  John E Calfee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.