Literature DB >> 11150049

Ancestral proportions and admixture dynamics in geographically defined African Americans living in South Carolina.

E J Parra1, R A Kittles, G Argyropoulos, C L Pfaff, K Hiester, C Bonilla, N Sylvester, D Parrish-Gause, W T Garvey, L Jin, P M McKeigue, M I Kamboh, R E Ferrell, W S Pollitzer, M D Shriver.   

Abstract

We analyzed admixture in samples of six different African-American populations from South Carolina: Gullah-speaking Sea Islanders in coastal South Carolina, residents of four counties in the "Low Country" (Berkeley, Charleston, Colleton, and Dorchester), and persons living in the city of Columbia, located in central South Carolina. We used a battery of highly informative autosomal, mtDNA, and Y-chromosome markers. Two of the autosomal markers (FY and AT3) are linked and lie 22 cM apart on chromosome 1. The results of this study indicate, in accordance with previous historical, cultural, and anthropological evidence, a very low level of European admixture in the Gullah Sea Islanders (m = 3.5 +/- 0.9%). The proportion of European admixture is higher in the Low Country (m ranging between 9. 9 +/- 1.8% and 14.0 +/- 1.9%), and is highest in Columbia (m = 17.7 +/- 3.1%). A sex-biased European gene flow and a small Native American contribution to the African-American gene pool are also evident in these data. We studied the pattern of pairwise allelic associations between the FY locus and the nine other autosomal markers in our samples. In the combined sample from the Low Country (N = 548), a high level of linkage disequilibrium was observed between the linked markers, FY and AT3. Additionally, significant associations were also detected between FY and 4 of the 8 unlinked markers, suggesting the existence of significant genetic structure in this population. A continuous gene flow model of admixture could explain the observed pattern of genetic structure. A test conditioning on the overall admixture of each individual showed association of ancestry between the two linked markers (FY and AT3), but not between any of the unlinked markers, as theory predicts. Thus, even in the presence of genetic structure due to continuous gene flow or some other factor, it is possible to differentiate associations due to linkage from spurious associations due to genetic structure. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11150049     DOI: 10.1002/1096-8644(200101)114:1<18::AID-AJPA1002>3.0.CO;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  116 in total

1.  Population structure in admixed populations: effect of admixture dynamics on the pattern of linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  C L Pfaff; E J Parra; C Bonilla; K Hiester; P M McKeigue; M I Kamboh; R G Hutchinson; R E Ferrell; E Boerwinkle; M D Shriver
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-12-07       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Markers for mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium in African American and Hispanic populations.

Authors:  M W Smith; J A Lautenberger; H D Shin; J P Chretien; S Shrestha; D A Gilbert; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Y chromosome STR haplotypes and the genetic structure of U.S. populations of African, European, and Hispanic ancestry.

Authors:  Manfred Kayser; Silke Brauer; Hiltrud Schädlich; Mechthild Prinz; Mark A Batzer; Peter A Zimmerman; B A Boatin; Mark Stoneking
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Mapping genes that predict treatment outcome in admixed populations.

Authors:  T M Baye; R A Wilke
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.550

5.  Markers informative for ancestry demonstrate consistent megabase-length linkage disequilibrium in the African American population.

Authors:  Heather E Collins-Schramm; Bill Chima; Darwin J Operario; Lindsey A Criswell; Michael F Seldin
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Control of confounding of genetic associations in stratified populations.

Authors:  Clive J Hoggart; Eteban J Parra; Mark D Shriver; Carolina Bonilla; Rick A Kittles; David G Clayton; Paul M McKeigue
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 7.  "Are we there yet?": Deciding when one has demonstrated specific genetic causation in complex diseases and quantitative traits.

Authors:  Grier P Page; Varghese George; Rodney C Go; Patricia Z Page; David B Allison
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Putative ancestral origins of chromosomal segments in individual african americans: implications for admixture mapping.

Authors:  Michael F Seldin; Takanobu Morii; Heather E Collins-Schramm; Bill Chima; Rick Kittles; Lindsey A Criswell; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Analyses of genetic structure of Tibeto-Burman populations reveals sex-biased admixture in southern Tibeto-Burmans.

Authors:  Bo Wen; Xuanhua Xie; Song Gao; Hui Li; Hong Shi; Xiufeng Song; Tingzhi Qian; Chunjie Xiao; Jianzhong Jin; Bing Su; Daru Lu; Ranajit Chakraborty; Li Jin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  The African diaspora: mitochondrial DNA and the Atlantic slave trade.

Authors:  Antonio Salas; Martin Richards; María-Victoria Lareu; Rosaria Scozzari; Alfredo Coppa; Antonio Torroni; Vincent Macaulay; Angel Carracedo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.