Literature DB >> 11149796

The influence of permanent magnetic field therapy on wound healing in suction lipectomy patients: a double-blind study.

D Man1, B Man, H Plosker.   

Abstract

The authors present their experience with the healing influence of permanent magnets on postoperative wounds. The responses of 20 patients who underwent suction lipectomy and postoperative negative magnetic field therapy were studied in a double-blind fashion. Magnets in the form of patches (10 patients) or sham magnet patches (10 patients) were placed over the operative region in each of the patients. Pain, edema, and discoloration (ecchymosis) were evaluated at 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 14 days postoperatively. Our results show that the treatment group had significant reductions in pain on postoperative days 1 through 7, in edema on days 1 through 4, and in discoloration on days 1 through 3 when compared with the control group. These results demonstrated that commercially available magnets have a positive influence on the postoperative healing process in suction lipectomy patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11149796     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199912000-00051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  12 in total

Review 1.  Biophysical Approaches for Oral Wound Healing: Emphasis on Photobiomodulation.

Authors:  Imran Khan; Praveen Arany
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Static magnets for reducing pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Max H Pittler; Elizabeth M Brown; Edzard Ernst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Stimulation of chondrogenic differentiation of adult human bone marrow-derived stromal cells by a moderate-strength static magnetic field.

Authors:  Harsh D Amin; Mariea Alice Brady; Jean-Philippe St-Pierre; Molly M Stevens; Darryl R Overby; C Ross Ethier
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Randomised controlled trial of magnetic bracelets for relieving pain in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee.

Authors:  Tim Harlow; Colin Greaves; Adrian White; Liz Brown; Anna Hart; Edzard Ernst
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-12-18

5.  Influence of inhomogeneous static magnetic field-exposure on patients with erosive gastritis: a randomized, self- and placebo-controlled, double-blind, single centre, pilot study.

Authors:  Márk Juhász; Viktor L Nagy; Hajnal Székely; Dorottya Kocsis; Zsolt Tulassay; János F László
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Effect of static magnetic field on experimental dermal wound strength.

Authors:  Yahya Ekici; Cem Aydogan; Cenk Balcik; Nihan Haberal; Mahir Kirnap; Gokhan Moray; Mehmet Haberal
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05

7.  Moderate strength (0.23-0.28 T) static magnetic fields (SMF) modulate signaling and differentiation in human embryonic cells.

Authors:  Zhiyun Wang; Anshu Sarje; Pao-Lin Che; Kevin J Yarema
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Static magnetic field therapy: a critical review of treatment parameters.

Authors:  Agatha P Colbert; Helané Wahbeh; Noelle Harling; Erin Connelly; Heather C Schiffke; Cora Forsten; William L Gregory; Marko S Markov; James J Souder; Patricia Elmer; Valerie King
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  The effect of magnetic fields on wound healing: experimental study and review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven L Henry; Matthew J Concannon; Gloria J Yee
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2008-07-25

10.  An Overview of Biofield Devices.

Authors:  David Muehsam; Gaétan Chevalier; Tiffany Barsotti; Blake T Gurfein
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2015-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.