Literature DB >> 11149613

A retrospective study of long-term psychosocial consequences and satisfaction after carrier testing in childhood in an autosomal recessive disease: aspartylglucosaminuria.

O Järvinen1, M Hietala, A M Aalto, M Arvio, A Uutela, P Aula, H Kääriäinen.   

Abstract

Genetic carrier testing of children is usually not recommended. However, there are no data concerning long-term psychological consequences, experience, and satisfaction of those tested as well as their recall of the test results. We evaluated these items retrospectively 10-24 years after carrier testing performed in childhood. Study material comprised 25 families with aspatylglucosaminuria (AGU), an autosomal recessive disorder, with 35 healthy sibs from all parts of Finland tested for carriership during childhood between 1973 and 1987. Of these sibs, 25 participated in our study. The questionnaire comprised multiple-choice and open-ended questions. The psychosocial well-being of the study subjects measured by the RAND 36 item Health Survey 1.0 (RAND) was, in general, at least as good as that of controls, and showed no significant differences between carriers and non-carriers (p > 0.154). All tested individuals were satisfied with the fact that they had been tested and stated that the decision to perform carrier testing on a child can be made by the parents. Of the 25 tested, 23 knew and understood their test result correctly at the time of our study. Most of the tested individuals (60%) stated that the best time for carrier testing would be in the childhood or in the teen years. This study indicates that carrier testing in childhood for an autosomal recessive disorder (AGU) had caused no measurable disturbance of quality of life in adulthood, and those tested reported being satisfied. However, we do not recommend testing in childhood, as the result is not needed prior to the time for reproductive decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11149613     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580604.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  5 in total

Review 1.  Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; John W Belmont; Jonathan S Berg; Benjamin E Berkman; Yvonne Bombard; Ingrid A Holm; Howard P Levy; Kelly E Ormond; Howard M Saal; Nancy B Spinner; Benjamin S Wilfond; Joseph D McInerney
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Using the impact of event scale to evaluate psychological response to being a phenylketonuria gene carrier.

Authors:  Catherine Y Read
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Parent and child perspectives on family interactions related to melanoma risk and prevention after CDKN2A/p16 testing of minor children.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Lisa G Aspinwall; Bridget Parsons; Tammy K Stump; Katy Nottingham; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Pamela Cassidy; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2020-01-18

Review 4.  The psychological impact of genetic information on children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Claire E Wakefield; Lucy V Hanlon; Katherine M Tucker; Andrea F Patenaude; Christina Signorelli; Jordana K McLoone; Richard J Cohn
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Genetic testing of children for adult-onset conditions: opinions of the British adult population and implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Shiri Shkedi-Rafid; Angela Fenwick; Sandi Dheensa; Anneke M Lucassen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.246

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.