BACKGROUND/AIMS: The interruption of hepatic arterial flow when performing a bilioenteric anastomosis has been reported to usually bring about serious postoperative complications, such as anastomotic leakage, hepatic abscess and infarction. We aimed to evaluate the surgical implications of the interlobar hepatic artery when patients with advanced biliary tract carcinomas undergo surgical resection with a bilioenteric anastomosis. METHODOLOGY: In 7 patients with advanced biliary tract carcinomas, the combined resection of the liver (greater than hemihepatectomy in 2 and less than hemihepatectomy in 5), extrahepatic bile duct, hepatic artery (right hepatic artery in 5, right and left hepatic artery in 1, left hepatic artery in 1), and the portal vein was performed in 4 patients. The portal vein was reconstructed in all 4 patients. The hepatic artery was reconstructed in only one patient, with combined resection of both right and left hepatic arteries, but was not reconstructed in 2 other patients, even though they underwent resection greater than hemihepatectomy. RESULTS: The interlobar hepatic artery running into the Glissonian sheath around the hepatic duct confluence could be preserved in 5 patients, as shown by angiography, but could not be preserved in 2 patients who underwent greater than hemihepatectomy. Moderate and transient ischemic liver damage occurred, but no serious postoperative complications were induced in any of the 5 patients in the unilateral hepatic artery preserved group. However, both cases without preservation of the hepatic artery encountered liver failure, liver abscess and leakage of bilioenteric anastomosis, and one patient died of multiple organ failure. CONCLUSIONS: One major lobar branch of the hepatic artery involved by cancer invasion could be safely resected without reconstruction in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinomas when the interlobar hepatic artery running into the Glissonian sheath around the hepatic duct confluence is preserved.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The interruption of hepatic arterial flow when performing a bilioenteric anastomosis has been reported to usually bring about serious postoperative complications, such as anastomotic leakage, hepatic abscess and infarction. We aimed to evaluate the surgical implications of the interlobar hepatic artery when patients with advanced biliary tract carcinomas undergo surgical resection with a bilioenteric anastomosis. METHODOLOGY: In 7 patients with advanced biliary tract carcinomas, the combined resection of the liver (greater than hemihepatectomy in 2 and less than hemihepatectomy in 5), extrahepatic bile duct, hepatic artery (right hepatic artery in 5, right and left hepatic artery in 1, left hepatic artery in 1), and the portal vein was performed in 4 patients. The portal vein was reconstructed in all 4 patients. The hepatic artery was reconstructed in only one patient, with combined resection of both right and left hepatic arteries, but was not reconstructed in 2 other patients, even though they underwent resection greater than hemihepatectomy. RESULTS: The interlobar hepatic artery running into the Glissonian sheath around the hepatic duct confluence could be preserved in 5 patients, as shown by angiography, but could not be preserved in 2 patients who underwent greater than hemihepatectomy. Moderate and transient ischemic liver damage occurred, but no serious postoperative complications were induced in any of the 5 patients in the unilateral hepatic artery preserved group. However, both cases without preservation of the hepatic artery encountered liver failure, liver abscess and leakage of bilioenteric anastomosis, and one patient died of multiple organ failure. CONCLUSIONS: One major lobar branch of the hepatic artery involved by cancer invasion could be safely resected without reconstruction in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinomas when the interlobar hepatic artery running into the Glissonian sheath around the hepatic duct confluence is preserved.
Authors: Eduardo de Santibañes; Victoria Ardiles; Fernando A Alvarez; Juan Pekolj; Claudio Brandi; Axel Beskow Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2011-10-23 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Vyacheslav I Egorov; Roman V Petrov; Michail V Lozhkin; Olga A Maynovskaya; Natalia S Starostina; Natalia R Chernaya; Ekaterina M Filippova Journal: World J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-03-27