Literature DB >> 11148440

Changing patterns of sedation use for routine out-patient diagnostic gastroscopy between 1989 and 1998.

H E Mulcahy1, E Hennessy, P Connor, B Rhodes, S E Patchett, M J Farthing, P D Fairclough.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of sedation trends for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is important for health service planning, particularly in view of rapidly increasing demands on endoscopy services. However, no data are available on sedation trends in Britain over the past 10 years. AIM: To determine sedation use for routine gastroscopy in a single endoscopy unit between 1989 and 1998.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 9795 consecutive adults (mean age 56 years, range 18-100 years; 4512 females) who had undergone a gastroscopy between 1989 and 1998. Clinical, pharmacological and endoscopic data were retrieved from a computerized database.
RESULTS: Over the 10-year study period, the sedation rate remained constant for patients undergoing therapeutic endoscopy (P=0.99) and those undergoing in-patient diagnostic examinations (P=0.63). In contrast, the sedation rate for out-patient diagnostic endoscopy decreased by 54%, from a high of 70% in 1990 to 32% in 1998 (P < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis showed that the decline in sedation use was greater in females (P < 0.0001) than males and in procedures performed by non-consultant compared to consultant staff (P=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: If our results form part of a national trend, they will have important implications for cardiopulmonary monitoring strategies, recovery room practices and for complication rates due to the use of sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11148440     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00912.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  7 in total

Review 1.  Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J G Williams; S E Roberts; M F Ali; W Y Cheung; D R Cohen; G Demery; A Edwards; M Greer; M D Hellier; H A Hutchings; B Ip; M F Longo; I T Russell; H A Snooks; J C Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Sedation for gastroscopy: Is it an adequately understood and informed choice?

Authors:  L Quinn; M E Kelly; A Khan; R Irwin; W Khan; K Barry; R Waldron; I Z Khan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Sedation/Analgesia Administration Practice Varies according to Endoscopy Facility (Hospital- or Office-Based) Setting: Results from a Nationwide Survey in Greece.

Authors:  Georgios Tziatzios; Dimitrios N Samonakis; Theocharis Tsionis; Spyridon Goulas; Dimitrios Christodoulou; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.260

4.  Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: are preparatory interventions or conscious sedation effective? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Lucio Trevisani; Sergio Sartori; Piergiorgio Gaudenzi; Giuseppe Gilli; Giancarlo Matarese; Sergio Gullini; Vincenzo Abbasciano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Unsedated endoscopy: is it feasible?

Authors:  Abdulrahman M Aljebreen
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

6.  Unmeasured improvement work: the lack of routinely collected, service-related data in NHS endoscopy units in England involved in "modernisation".

Authors:  Kymberley Thorne; Hayley A Hutchings; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  The influence of escort during upper endoscopy and colonoscopy on patient satisfaction and anxiety.

Authors:  Jafar Nasiri; Narges Khatib; Soleiman Kheiri; Mostafa Najafi
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.