Literature DB >> 11147689

Mechanical stimulation by external application of cyclic tensile strains does not effectively enhance bone healing.

P Augat1, J Merk, S Wolf, L Claes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an externally induced interfragmentary movement enhances the healing process of a fracture under flexible fixation.
DESIGN: Randomized, prospective in vivo animal study with control group. Twenty-four skeletally mature Merino sheep were randomly assigned to six groups of four animals, which received cyclic interfragmentary movements of 0.2 and 0.8 millimeters and stimulation frequencies of 1, 5, and 10 Hertz, respectively. Twelve animals did not receive any externally applied stimulation and served as a control group.
SETTING: Unrestricted stall activity with weight bearing reduced by tenotomy of the Achilles tendon.
INTERVENTIONS: Osteotomy of the tibial diaphysis with three-millimeter gap width fixed with a six-pin, monolateral, double-bar external fixator. Interfragmentary movement of the osteotomy gap was externally induced by a motor-driven actuator unit. Five hundred cycles inducing nonuniform tensile strains within the gap were performed each day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Nine weeks after surgery, the animals were killed, and bone mineral density and callus cross-sectional area were measured with quantitative computed tomography. Callus projectional area was assessed by radiographs, and mechanical stability was determined with a three-point bending test.
RESULTS: External stimulation with nonuniform cyclic tensile strains did slightly affect but not significantly enhance the fracture healing process. Varying the stimulation frequency had no influence on the healing process. The stimulation with 0.8 millimeter displacement magnitude resulted in a larger periosteal callus, but a decreased bone mineral density compared with the 0.2-millimeter displacement magnitude. The stimulation had no significant influence on the mechanical properties of the healing bone.
CONCLUSIONS: Induced cyclic tensile strains did not produce a relevant enhancement of bone healing under flexible fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11147689     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200101000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Research on the nature of micromovement and the biomechanical staging of fracture healing].

Authors:  Jinyou Shi; Yuzhou Xiao; Min Wu; Jianzhong Guan
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-09-15

Review 2.  Mechanotransduction of bone cells in vitro: mechanobiology of bone tissue.

Authors:  M Mullender; A J El Haj; Y Yang; M A van Duin; E H Burger; J Klein-Nulend
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Musculoskeletal response to whole-body vibration during fracture healing in intact and ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Ewa K Stuermer; Marina Komrakova; Carsten Werner; Michael Wicke; Leila Kolios; Stephan Sehmisch; Mohammad Tezval; Clara Utesch; Orzala Mangal; Sebastian Zimmer; Christian Dullin; Klaus M Stuermer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Mechanotransduction and fracture repair.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Ryan E Gleason; Lauren N M Hayward; Pui L Leong; Kristy T Salisbury Palomares
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Mechanics and mechano-biology of fracture healing in normal and osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Peter Augat; Ulrich Simon; Astrid Liedert; Lutz Claes
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Knee loading accelerates bone healing in mice.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Qiwei Sun; Charles H Turner; Hiroki Yokota
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 7.  Joint loading modality: its application to bone formation and fracture healing.

Authors:  P Zhang; G M Malacinski; H Yokota
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Mechanical stimulation alters tissue differentiation and molecular expression during bone healing.

Authors:  Kristy T Salisbury Palomares; Ryan E Gleason; Zachary D Mason; Dennis M Cullinane; Thomas A Einhorn; Louis C Gerstenfeld; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Novel systems for the application of isolated tensile, compressive, and shearing stimulation of distraction callus tissue.

Authors:  Nicholaus Meyers; Julian Schülke; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Claes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Bone fracture healing in mechanobiological modeling: A review of principles and methods.

Authors:  Mohammad S Ghiasi; Jason Chen; Ashkan Vaziri; Edward K Rodriguez; Ara Nazarian
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2017-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.