G Gavelli1, E Giampalma. 1. Institute of Radiology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, Italy. rad3@med.unibo.it
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence and mortality rates of lung carcinoma have been increasing during the last years. Despite this, medical public policy holds that chest X-ray screening is ineffective in the early detection of lung carcinoma. METHODS: The authors reviewed the most important studies published in the literature regarding the role of chest X-ray screening in the early diagnosis of lung carcinoma in a high risk population. None of the four randomized, controlled trials on lung carcinoma screening conducted in male cigarette smokers demonstrated a reduction in the mortality rate. Accordingly, no organization that formulates screening policy advocates any specific early detection strategies for lung carcinoma. RESULTS: A careful analysis of randomized, controlled trials showed that there was no improvement in the mortality rate in the screened populations, but there is considerable evidence that chest X-ray screening is associated with earlier detection and improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: In the authors' opinion, the considerable improvements in distribution by disease stage, tumor resectability, and patient survival in the screened groups demonstrate the effectiveness of chest X-ray screening in the early detection of lung carcinoma. The authors conclude that radiographic screening is the only valid method of secondary prevention in cigarette smokers.
BACKGROUND: The incidence and mortality rates of lung carcinoma have been increasing during the last years. Despite this, medical public policy holds that chest X-ray screening is ineffective in the early detection of lung carcinoma. METHODS: The authors reviewed the most important studies published in the literature regarding the role of chest X-ray screening in the early diagnosis of lung carcinoma in a high risk population. None of the four randomized, controlled trials on lung carcinoma screening conducted in male cigarette smokers demonstrated a reduction in the mortality rate. Accordingly, no organization that formulates screening policy advocates any specific early detection strategies for lung carcinoma. RESULTS: A careful analysis of randomized, controlled trials showed that there was no improvement in the mortality rate in the screened populations, but there is considerable evidence that chest X-ray screening is associated with earlier detection and improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: In the authors' opinion, the considerable improvements in distribution by disease stage, tumor resectability, and patient survival in the screened groups demonstrate the effectiveness of chest X-ray screening in the early detection of lung carcinoma. The authors conclude that radiographic screening is the only valid method of secondary prevention in cigarette smokers.
Authors: Ana E González-Santiago; Luz A Mendoza-Topete; Francisco Sánchez-Llamas; Rogelio Troyo-Sanromán; Carmen M Gurrola-Díaz Journal: J Clin Lab Anal Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.352
Authors: Paul P Anglim; Janice S Galler; Michael N Koss; Jeffrey A Hagen; Sally Turla; Mihaela Campan; Daniel J Weisenberger; Peter W Laird; Kimberly D Siegmund; Ite A Laird-Offringa Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2008-07-10 Impact factor: 27.401