Literature DB >> 11147611

The Mayo Lung Project: a perspective.

R S Fontana1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Mayo Lung Project (MLP) was a randomized, controlled, clinical trial designed to determine whether intensive radiologic and cytologic screening for lung carcinoma could reduce lung carcinoma mortality significantly.
METHODS: Half the MLP population was encouraged (and reminded) to undergo free chest X-rays and free sputum cytology tests every 4 months for 6 years, whereas the other half of the population was advised to undergo the 2 tests yearly.
RESULTS: Lung carcinoma incidence rate, resectability, and survivorship were greater in the intensively screened group compared with the control group, but there was no significant difference in the lung carcinoma mortality rate between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The intensive screening program cannot be recommended as a public health measure because it did not appear to result in decreased lung carcinoma mortality, even though it did yield an increased rate of incidence of apparently indolent tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11147611     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2352::aid-cncr7>3.3.co;2-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

Review 1.  Cancer screening in renal transplant recipients: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Germaine Wong; Jeremy R Chapman; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Integrated CT/bronchoscopy in the central airways: preliminary results.

Authors:  Melissa J Suter; Joseph M Reinhardt; Geoffrey McLennan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the baseline findings of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Muralikrishna Gopal; Shaad E Abdullah; James J Grady; James S Goodwin
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 4.  Implementing lung cancer screening in the real world: opportunity, challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Robert J Optican; Caroline Chiles
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

5.  Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Timothy R Church; William C Black; Denise R Aberle; Christine D Berg; Kathy L Clingan; Fenghai Duan; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; David S Gierada; Gordon C Jones; Irene Mahon; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks; Amanda Jain; Sarah Baum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Screening for lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Frank C Detterbeck; Peter J Mazzone; David P Naidich; Peter B Bach
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  "Risk homeostasis"or "teachable moment"? the interaction between smoking behavior and lung cancer screening in the Mayo Lung Project.

Authors:  Lu Shi; Martin Y Iguchi
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.600

Review 8.  The Performance of Deep Learning Algorithms on Automatic Pulmonary Nodule Detection and Classification Tested on Different Datasets That Are Not Derived from LIDC-IDRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dana Li; Bolette Mikela Vilmun; Jonathan Frederik Carlsen; Elisabeth Albrecht-Beste; Carsten Ammitzbøl Lauridsen; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Kristoffer Lindskov Hansen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 9.  Challenges in Lung Cancer Screening in Latin America.

Authors:  Luis E Raez; Amanda Nogueira; Edgardo S Santos; Ricardo Sales Dos Santos; Juliana Franceschini; David Arias Ron; Mark Block; Nise Yamaguchi; Christian Rolfo
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2018-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.