Literature DB >> 11147117

[Autologous breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap].

R Rouzier1, C Louis-Sylvestre, C Nos, A Fitoussi, K B Clough.   

Abstract

The gold standard technique for autologous breast reconstruction is the transverse rectus abdominis flap (TRAM). Recently, techniques of harvesting a latissimus dorsi flap have been modified in such a way as to increase the flap and allow breast reconstruction without an associated implant. The aim of this study was to evaluate aesthetic results obtained with this method and to assess early morbidity related to the changes in the technique. Between January 1994 and August 1998, 43 patients underwent breast reconstruction with an autologous latissimus dorsi flap. Their postoperative outcome was compared to that of 30 patients who underwent reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi flap associated with an implant. These 43 patients were asked to come back for aesthetic evaluation by a physician and to answer a questionnaire about cosmetic results. Mean duration of follow-up was 18.6 months (range 8 to 60). Mean size of the breast reconstructed with this technique was 340 g (up to 835 g). Dorsal seroma was the most frequent complication (72%), followed by delayed dorsal healing (19%). The frequency of seroma was significantly increased when compared to a classic latissimus dorsi flap (P = 0.003), but frequency of skin slough was not. The aesthetic result was considered satisfactory in 93% of the cases by the patient and 77% of the cases by the physician. In conclusion, the extended latissimus dorsi flap allows reconstruction of small and medium size breasts, with a good aesthetic result. This flap appears to be an interesting alternative to the TRAM flap for autologous reconstruction in selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11147117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet        ISSN: 0294-1260            Impact factor:   0.660


  3 in total

1.  Complications following autologous latissimus flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Mufid Burgic; Cathrine Bruant Rodier; Astrid Wilk; Frédéric Bodin; Adi Rifatbegović; Emir Halilbasic; Musfaha Burgic; Eldar Brkic; Harun Avdagic
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.363

2.  Reasons of not having breast reconstruction: a historical cohort of 1937 breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy.

Authors:  Delphine Héquet; Kevin Zarca; Sylvie Dolbeault; Benoît Couturaud; Charlotte Ngô; Virgine Fourchotte; Anne De La Rochefordière; Jean-Guillaume Féron; Alfred Fitoussi; Catherine Bélichard; Fabien Reyal; Fatima Laki; David Hajage; Brigitte Sigal; Bernard Asselain; Séverine Alran
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-07-18

3.  Acellular dermal matrix combined with oxidized regenerated cellulose for partial breast reconstruction: Two case reports.

Authors:  Jeeyeon Lee; Jung Dug Yang; Jeong Woo Lee; Junjie Li; Jin Hyang Jung; Wan Wook Kim; Chan Sub Park; Joon Seok Lee; Ho Yong Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.