Literature DB >> 11146956

The effects of continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective, randomized study--Part II.

C C Trowbridge1, M Vasquez, A H Stammers, K Glogowski, K Tremain, K Niimi, M Muhle, T Yiang.   

Abstract

The impact of blood gas management during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on patient care has not been examined and remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine whether precise blood gas management during CPB influences patient outcome. Fifty-nine patients were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved, prospective, randomized study. An in-line blood gas monitor (CDI 500) was placed into the arterial and venous lines for all patients. Blood gas monitoring in the control group was managed by intermittent sampling (every 20-30 min), while the treatment group was managed with continuous monitoring. Blood gas control and measured parameters were as follows: pH 7.40 +/- 0.05, PaCO2 40 +/- 5 mmHg, PaO2 200 +/- 50 mmHg. The treatment group had the CDI 500 guide clinical decisions. Compared to the control group, the treatment group consisted of significantly more diabetic (7% vs. 47%, p < or = 0.001), renal failure (3% vs. 13%, p < or = 0.01), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients (7% vs. 20%, p < or = 0.01). Internal thoracic artery utilization was higher in treatment patients than control patients (67% vs. 95%, p < or = 0.02). No other differences existed in demographic, pharmacological, surgical, or anesthetic parameters. In the perioperative period, the control group required antiarrythmic support more frequently than the treatment group (10% vs. 0%, p < or = 0.05). Compared to the control group, the treatment group required antiarrythmic (18% vs. 10%, p < or = 0.05) and cardiac glycoside therapy (11% vs. 0%, p < or = 0.05) less frequently in the postoperative period. Although treatment patients required less intraoperative pacing and cardioversion and spent less time on mechanical ventilation, in the intensive care unit (ICU), and in the hospital than control patients, statistical significance was not achieved. In conclusion, the use of continuous, in-line blood gas monitoring resulted in improvement in a number of postoperative outcome variables, although ICU and hospital stay was not effected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11146956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  8 in total

1.  In vitro comparison of the new in-line monitor BMU 40 versus a conventional laboratory analyzer.

Authors:  F Oliver Grosse; David Holzhey; Volkmar Falk; Jan Schaarschmidt; Klaus Kraemer; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2010-03

2.  Improved outcomes during cardiac surgery: a multifactorial enhancement of cardiopulmonary bypass techniques.

Authors:  Cody C Trowbridge; Alfred H Stammers; G Craig Wood; James D Murdock; Myra Klayman; Bianca R Yen; Edward Woods; Christian Gilbert
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2005-06

3.  Clinical evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the CDI 500 in-line blood gas monitor with and without gas calibration.

Authors:  Anne Louise Bellaiche; Peter F Nielsen; Steven Brantlov; Marianne B Møller; Michael Winterdahl
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2011-06

4.  Improving cardiopulmonary bypass: does continuous blood gas monitoring have a role to play?

Authors:  Jane Ottens; Sigrid C Tuble; Andrew J Sanderson; John L Knight; Robert A Baker
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2010-09

5.  Clinical evaluation of the ABL-77 for point-of-care analysis in the cardiovascular operating room.

Authors:  Jack S Prichard; John S French; Nestor Alvar
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2006-06

6.  Biofeedback: making the science real.

Authors:  Robert A Baker; Richard F Newland; Jayme Bennetts
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2009-12

Review 7.  American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology: Development of Standards and Guidelines for Pediatric and Congenital Perfusion Practice (2019).

Authors:  Molly E Oldeen; Ronald E Angona; Ashley Hodge; Tom Klein
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2020-12

8.  Assessment of a continuous blood gas monitoring system in animals during circulatory stress.

Authors:  Sandro Gelsomino; Roberto Lorusso; Ugolino Livi; Stefano Romagnoli; Salvatore Mario Romano; Rocco Carella; Fabiana Lucà; Giuseppe Billè; Francesco Matteucci; Attilio Renzulli; Gil Bolotin; Giuseppe De Cicco; Pierluigi Stefàno; Jos Maessen; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.217

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.