Literature DB >> 11146768

Transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt vs surgical shunt in good-risk cirrhotic patients: a case-control comparison.

W S Helton1, R Maves, K Wicks, K Johansen.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: In good-risk patients with variceal bleeding undergoing portal decompression, surgical shunt is more effective, more durable, and less costly than angiographic shunt (transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt [TIPS]).
DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study.
SETTING: Academic referral center for liver disease. PATIENTS: Patients with Child-Pugh class A or B cirrhosis with at least 1 prior episode of bleeding from portal hypertension (gastroesophageal varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy). INTERVENTION: Portal decompression by angiographic (TIPS) or surgical (portacaval, distal splenorenal) shunt. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day and long-term mortality, postintervention diagnostic procedures (endoscopic, ultrasonographic, and angiographic studies), hospital readmissions, variceal rebleeding episodes, blood transfusions, shunt revisions, and hospital and professional charges.
RESULTS: Patients with Child-Pugh class A or B cirrhosis undergoing TIPS (n = 20) or surgical shunt (n = 20) were followed up for 385 and 456 patient-months, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was greater following TIPS compared with surgical shunt (20% vs 0%; P =.20); long-term mortality did not differ. Significantly more rebleeding episodes (P<.001); rehospitalizations (P<.05); diagnostic studies of all types (P<.001); shunt revisions (P<.001); and hospital (P<.005), professional (P<.05), and total (P<. 005) charges occurred following TIPS compared with surgical shunt.
CONCLUSIONS: Operative portal decompression is more effective, more durable, and less costly than TIPS in Child-Pugh class A and B cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding. Good-risk patients with portal hypertensive bleeding should be referred for surgical shunt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11146768     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.136.1.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Portosystemic shunt surgery between TIPS and liver transplantation].

Authors:  G Puhl; S Gül; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Management of the cirrhotic patient that needs surgery.

Authors:  Christopher L Bell; D Rohan Jeyarajah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12

3.  Natural history of a randomized trial comparing distal spleno-renal shunt with endoscopic sclerotherapy in the prevention of variceal rebleeding: a lesson from the past.

Authors:  Roberto Santambrogio; Enrico Opocher; Mara Costa; Savino Bruno; Andrea Pisani Ceretti; Gian Paolo Spina
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Current use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.

Authors:  Timothy M McCashland
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-02

Review 5.  When endoscopic therapy or pharmacotherapy fails to control variceal bleeding: what should be done? Immediate control of bleeding by TIPS?

Authors:  Martin Rössle
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  Outcomes of TIPS for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Variceal Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ahmad Parvinian; Ron C Gaba
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Randomized controlled trial of emergency transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus emergency portacaval shunt treatment of acute bleeding esophageal varices in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Marshall J Orloff; Florin Vaida; Kevin S Haynes; Robert J Hye; Jon I Isenberg; Horacio Jinich-Brook
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Surgical portosystemic shunts in the era of TIPS and liver transplantation are still relevant.

Authors:  Ilia Gur; Brian S Diggs; Susan L Orloff
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 9.  Current state of portosystemic shunt surgery.

Authors:  Martin Wolff; Andreas Hirner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 10.  Update on Shunt Surgery.

Authors:  Tim R Glowka; Jörg C Kalff; Steffen Manekeller
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.