Literature DB >> 11146303

Transmural replacement of myocardium after skeletal myoblast grafting into the heart. Too much of a good thing?

H Reinecke1, C E Murry.   

Abstract

Skeletal myoblasts form stable grafts in the heart and may improve myocardial performance after infarction. The current study compared the ability of different immortalized myoblast lines, or primary myoblast isolates, to form grafts in the normal or cryoinjured heart. With a constant dose of 6 x 10(6) cells, primary rat myoblasts and mouse C2C12 myoblasts formed similarly large skeletal muscle grafts in recipient rat hearts. Grafts often caused transmural replacement of the myocardium in normal hearts and almost completely replaced the damaged region in cryoinjured hearts. To test for possible artifacts due to immunosuppression and xenografting (mouse C2C12 cells into rat hearts), we grafted 1 x 10(6) mouse MM14 or C2C12 myoblasts into normal hearts of nude mice. Again, the C2C12 grafts caused transmural replacement of the left ventricular wall and distorted the epi- and endocardial contours. The MM14 cells, however, formed relatively small grafts. The C2C12 grafts showed substantially higher BrdU incorporation rates at day 4 compared with MM14 cells, suggesting that ongoing proliferation was responsible for the increased graft size. None of the three skeletal muscle cell types expressed detectable amounts of the gap junction protein connexin43 after grafting. The intercellular adhesion protein N-cadherin was not expressed in primary skeletal muscle grafts, but was spotty or abundant in C2C12- and MM14-derived grafts, respectively. The absence of connexin43 precluded electrical coupling between graft and host muscle cells. Thus, when sufficient amounts of proliferation occur after grafting, skeletal muscle cells can effectively replace the volume of lost myocardium. Excess proliferation, however, can cause grafts to expand the ventricular wall and possibly impair pump function. Optimal cardiac repair strategies may need to incorporate methods to control graft cell proliferation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11146303     DOI: 10.1016/s1054-8807(00)00055-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Pathol        ISSN: 1054-8807            Impact factor:   2.185


  16 in total

Review 1.  Stem cell death and survival in heart regeneration and repair.

Authors:  Eltyeb Abdelwahid; Audrone Kalvelyte; Aurimas Stulpinas; Katherine Athayde Teixeira de Carvalho; Luiz Cesar Guarita-Souza; Gabor Foldes
Journal:  Apoptosis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Slow turning lateral vessel bioreactor improves embryoid body formation and cardiogenic differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Sasitorn Rungarunlert; Nuttha Klincumhom; Theerawat Tharasanit; Mongkol Techakumphu; Melinda K Pirity; Andras Dinnyes
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 3.  Genetic enhancement of stem cell engraftment, survival, and efficacy.

Authors:  Marc S Penn; Abeel A Mangi
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 4.  Regenerating functional heart tissue for myocardial repair.

Authors:  Andre Alcon; Esra Cagavi Bozkulak; Yibing Qyang
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Loss of FilaminC (FLNc) results in severe defects in myogenesis and myotube structure.

Authors:  I Dalkilic; J Schienda; T G Thompson; L M Kunkel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Striated muscle function, regeneration, and repair.

Authors:  I Y Shadrin; A Khodabukus; N Bursac
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 7.  Stem cell therapy for cardiovascular disease: the demise of alchemy and rise of pharmacology.

Authors:  T Jadczyk; A Faulkner; P Madeddu
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Mobilized bone marrow cells repair the infarcted heart, improving function and survival.

Authors:  D Orlic; J Kajstura; S Chimenti; F Limana; I Jakoniuk; F Quaini; B Nadal-Ginard; D M Bodine; A Leri; P Anversa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Skeletal myoblasts for cardiac repair.

Authors:  Shazia Durrani; Mikhail Konoplyannikov; Muhammad Ashraf; Khawaja Husnain Haider
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.806

10.  The mouse C2C12 myoblast cell surface N-linked glycoproteome: identification, glycosite occupancy, and membrane orientation.

Authors:  Rebekah L Gundry; Kimberly Raginski; Yelena Tarasova; Irina Tchernyshyov; Damaris Bausch-Fluck; Steven T Elliott; Kenneth R Boheler; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Bernd Wollscheid
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 5.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.