Literature DB >> 11146161

Variable cytotoxicity of diphtheria toxin 388-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor fusion protein for acute myelogenous leukemia stem cells.

M Feuring-Buske1, A Frankel, B Gerhard, D Hogge.   

Abstract

In this study, the utility of DT388-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for the ex vivo purging and direct administration to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is tested using clonogenic assays, long-term cultures (LTC), and NOD/SCID mice as assays for leukemic progenitors. We compare the ability of 24-hour exposure to 0.3 microg/mL (4 nM) DT388-GM-CSF to kill AML colony forming cells (CFC) and the more primitive AML progenitors detected after 6 weeks in stromal cocultures (AML LTC-initiating cells or AML LTC-IC) and after 8 weeks in NOD/SCID mice.AML samples (n = 10), expressing a mean of 35 to 1466 GM-CSF receptors/blast, showed mean (range) percent kills of AML CFC and LTC-IC of 61 (17-98) and 46 (0-94) respectively with a direct correlation (r = 0.69) between the % kills detected in the in vitro assays. Among 5 evaluable samples the percent reduction in AML cell engraftment in NOD/SCID marrow following ex vivo DT388-GM-CSF treatment varied from 38% to 100%. 40% to 56% of normal bone marrow CFC and 31% to 48% of normal LTC-IC survived the same ex vivo treatment (n = 3). In subsequent experiments, NOD/SCID mice received AML blast cell injections intravenously followed in 24 hours by 1.5 microg DT388-GM-CSF daily intraperitoneally for 5 days. A reduction of marrow blast cells was seen with 7 of 9 samples tested 4 to 12 weeks post one course of toxin. Repeating the 5-day course of toxin 2 or 3 times at 4-week intervals did not improve the response, while delaying administration until 4 to 8 weeks post AML cell injection reduced the toxin's effectiveness (n = 5).This fusion toxin may prove useful for in vitro purging of stem cell harvests from selected AML patients and for direct administration to such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11146161     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-472x(00)00542-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Hematol        ISSN: 0301-472X            Impact factor:   3.084


  6 in total

1.  Sensitivity of cancer cells to truncated diphtheria toxin.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Wendy Schulte; Desmond Pink; Kyle Phipps; Andries Zijlstra; John D Lewis; David Morton Waisman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Treatment concepts for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Wolfgang R Sperr; Alexander W Hauswirth; Friedrich Wimazal; Paul Knöbl; Klaus Geissler; Peter Valent
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Cellular Entry of the Diphtheria Toxin Does Not Require the Formation of the Open-Channel State by Its Translocation Domain.

Authors:  Alexey S Ladokhin; Mauricio Vargas-Uribe; Mykola V Rodnin; Chiranjib Ghatak; Onkar Sharma
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 4.  Targeted Diphtheria Toxin-Based Therapy: A Review Article.

Authors:  Fatemeh Shafiee; Marc G Aucoin; Ali Jahanian-Najafabadi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Approval of tagraxofusp-erzs for blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm.

Authors:  Naveen Pemmaraju; Marina Konopleva
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-08-25

Review 6.  pH-triggered conformational switching along the membrane insertion pathway of the diphtheria toxin T-domain.

Authors:  Alexey S Ladokhin
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.